The Parallel Universe

FROM: https://www.ttbrown.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 551f#p1871

by Mark Culpepper on Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:50 am

Just trying to keep up with the "flow of things" here!

I have been struck for a very long time now with the thought that historically, maybe we are just going around in a very big circle, over ground we have somehow covered before. Now , is this what you call a "hiccup" or is it something else here as well?

Trying to adopt Pauls "Its never either/ or", so if its not a hiccup then what could it ALSO be?

In an effort to try and sort out what is going on, may I suggest the IDEA of "SEQUENCY", to which I will introduce "INTERVAL" as two pertinent concepts which needs serious contemplation by all who decide to post in this forum.

We have seen the "Turtle on the fencepost". The Old forum is our "PRE-Hiccup" Period.

This new forum is our "POST HICCUP" period.

The Question is?? How many of you will notice the appearance of the "sequency" of this very big holographic circle.

LET US KNOW WHEN YOU DO!!!

When some new forum member stumbles into this forum and starts to discuss all those topics we have beat to death we can deal with it in several ways....., IGNORE IT,......Respond as we would as if we never spoke about it before....., or,..... JUST SAY "HICCUP" and everyone will wonder what it's all about.

MAYBE we can finally ween the masses away from the concept of "frequency".....-towards the concept of "Sequency".

MORE INFORMATION HERE:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... ?full=true

Trickfox

Bonjour trompe reynard, cava?
Thanks for making me look back at that thread, some or your maths reasoning goes straight over my head, but the cyclic nature of the geometries involved make sense, and may well have been why Dr Brown kept playing the SOUND OF MUSIC, imo.
I believe it was goebels who started the switch from just intonation to it's present true?, why?

If the whole shooting match is a tense structure resulting in sound wave type points creating the stars and planets, then it makes sense for it all to be totally cyclic, with a recurring condition repeating of similer outcomes relevant to the inputs on a vast array of geometries.
flowpersons link to this caught my attention,
http://smphillips.8m.com/html/articles.html

the nested polygons of two centres forming the tree of life make great sense to me and what I detect.

Did Dr Brown have any contact with people involved in the cycles of all recordable phenonoma?
kevin

kevin.b wrote: I believe it was goebels who started the switch from just intonation to it's present true?, why?
kevin

I think you mean Kurt Gödel right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_G%C3%B6del

as in:...... The next sentence is false..... May I tell you that that last sentence was true?

Trickfox

Trickfox,
No it was joseph goebbels I was on about, he apparently pushed to alter A432 to A440, but it was fully implemented in 1953 I believe.
goebbels may possibly have been utilising various sound methods to influence the people.
if the universe is based on A432 then we are too, and alteration locally will result in a dissconnect from nature, the fan's tuning would be good to know?
I suspect it will have been to universe, and thus RETURNING?
Kevin

Oh....OK....
Yea.... I see....
We are speaking of a "natural" frequency right?
Would it be in harmony with anything specific Kevin?

trickfox,
"Anything specific"
Everything, all made from no-thing, a cyclic system that has spherical fractal geometry=headache.
Surely if you want to operate in a system, you must comply with the system.
Dr Brown to my strange reasoning was achieving a level of compliance, and I for one desire to comprehend this and the system, my dowsing gives me a glimpse, and a feeling of a connection, a oneness.

Perhaps we should start a thread asking WHY each person is here?
Some appear to want to build a machine, a device, myself apart from wanting to demonstrate that gravity is not a force , but a consequence by floating about in a pink pig, I am not driven by such, I know I know, but can't fit the puzzle together, I intend to though.
Kevin

Kevin, in order to leave out "human bias", such as egotism,and all the other human frailties out of you sensory input I would search for NATURALLLY occuring frequencies. Whale song, bird song, resonnances in atomic nuclei etc...

I once worked on a home alarm system where a very tricky parrot lived. I was testing the alarm keypad from the basement and listening upstairs for the keypad "beeps" that signalled when the detectors were functioning. The beeps comming from upstairs indicated that there was a malfunction in the system. I worked several hours tracing the wires downstairs to try and determine why the keypad upstairs was beeping when it should not have been doing so. A few hours after my frustrating search for the problem I came back upstairs to look at the keyad to see if someone was fooling around with it.
That is when I heard the parrot mimicking the keypad beeps. The little bugger had me running around chasing an invisible problem all day long because he learned how to get people's attention when he mimicked a man made alarm indicating beeping sound.

Do you see how nature can sometimes be cruel, - but clever anyhow?

Tricked-fox

Trickfox,
I am part of nature, and watch it very closely, I definately follow it's rythms and real time, not this clock rubbish.
I consider Dr Brown was following the same, especially with sidereal timing from galaxy, I can follow the dragon about, watch it and sort of talk to it( them)
Then to scale , think of it out into universe, follow it's winding repeating passage.
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/a ... /time.html
Kevin

Hi, I am new here. I viewed all posts.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Select from a large selection of fine quality gold, Fine Estate Jewelry, A fine line of jewelry

chdieawoy wrote:Hi, I am new here. I viewed all posts.

Gee.... You have finished reading ALL the 30,000 + posts that we put up over the past four years?

Or, did you just read this thread only.....??

Trickfox

Trickfox wrote:

chdieawoy wrote:Hi, I am new here. I viewed all posts.

Gee.... You have finished reading ALL the 30,000 + posts that we put up over the past four years?

Or, did you just read this thread only.....??

Trickfox

Mr. Trickfox,

Copied from the Board Index:

Total posts 21000 • Total topics 400 • Total members 136 • Our newest member Copper

Mikado

Gee...you're right Mr. Mikado I put in 10,000 too many posts.
Forgive me, math is not my strongest subject.

Trickfox

From the link trickfox posted:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... ?full=true

According to Hogan, the holographic principle radically changes our picture of space-time. Theoretical physicists have long believed that quantum effects will cause space-time to convulse wildly on the tiniest scales. At this magnification, the fabric of space-time becomes grainy and is ultimately made of tiny units rather like pixels, but a hundred billion billion times smaller than a proton. This distance is known as the Planck length, a mere 10-35 metres. The Planck length is far beyond the reach of any conceivable experiment, so nobody dared dream that the graininess of space-time might be discernable.

This is the scale of the ether...a hundred billion billion times smaller than a proton.
Pre-particle, that from which all arises..the source of gravity...the ancients experienced it...
and so can we...the ether!

skyfish

How do you get conclusive statements when an article is titled as the following?

Our world may be a giant hologram

cut and paste time from Dictionary.com:

may
1. (used to express possibility): It may rain.
2. (used to express opportunity or permission): You may enter.
3. (used to express contingency, esp. in clauses indicating condition, concession, purpose, result, etc.): I may be wrong but I think you would be wise to go. Times may change but human nature stays the same.
4. (used to express wish or prayer): May you live to an old age.
5. Archaic. (used to express ability or power.)

What am I failing to see as conclusive in the link?

Mikado

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.2948v1.

Remember the LHC?

Remember those pesky bothersome notions of creating a dangerous sized black hole? well guess what? There is still an ongoing concern over this. Seems like there are still doubts about it. I think there are curious discreprancies with the way Newtonian Gravity forces will likely react.

Well Newtonian Calculus is still in use everywhere and there is no doubt that we have created all kinds of technology using it, however now that we are playing around with subatomic particles at such high energies, we are not so sure anymore if those constances are really CONSTANT when it comes to the gravity force (dimensionally corrected of course).

The above paper is extremely interesting (even though I just barely understand some of the math used).

What is most interesting is that "I believe" some of the concepts introduced in this paper include some of the recent ideas I've been looking at such as "Locally Localized Gravity".

So.... This summer ... again.... Are we going to try cattle-prodding the G-D particle?

geez...

we need to slow down a bit.....

Trickfox