natecull wrote:Thanks for this, Langley.
An interesting effect I hadn't realised (though I have the vague memory I may have heard it quoted as a child, They were presumably pretty quick to pinpoint it, so I guess they must have been, though the report says on p 103:
For Starfish, detailed predictions of synchrotron radiation were not made. The long lifetimes clearly imply that injection of betas occurred well above detonation altitude.
That must have been an interesting question (how did the betas get so high?) but dumping relativistic particles into the ionosphere doesn't seem (at least to this layman) like a thing that could be easily duplicated with mere radio-frequency heaters like Platteville and HAARP, so maybe that particular line of research tapered out after the end of atmospheric testing? Or maybe it was a bit too scary?
(I don't buy most of the HAARP paranoia, but it does seem from cursory browsing of Wikipedia that the ionosphere is an interesting environment, almost 'alive' in its way. Cascading ripple effects and such. Possibly a lot can be learned with just a little subtle probing.)
The betas - if you look at the fallout residues for the earth, you find the north polar reasons worse off. The betas. The plasma, the incoming flow from the sun. the RF saturation of Plattesville etc and the bombs both had the effect of funnellling stuff, charging up the affecting layer and doing things to the magneitcs.
Brown was involved in Argus if I remember rightly. The ICBM had rendered the Nike anti soviet bomber missile redundant. The test ban was looming. They needed something. They gave it a go. I think HAARP is more than research. I dont know. But it is probably many things. There is DARPA input.
Trillions of horsepower comes in daily over the sun/earth circuit. It goes to the poles.
Sexed coils - would that be pulse phased electromagnetics at all?
Lots of antennas at HAARP. Thats a crazy thought isnt it. resonant though.
I dont know Twigsnapper, thanks for the bearing though. I only have a gut feeling.
Nate, when I get technical or try to, Im a VW going sideways. OK, so in the Tech guide for
Starfish prime, what can you see there that solar flares/ EM storms have in common?
Its not that the RF transmitters or the bombs are doing anything new. The solar interaction
have always done such things only not so localised. Even down to particle flows (esp down to
particle flows) Ions follow the flux lines. Solar flares induce increased earth currents. So did the bombs. Solar flares affect the plasma characteristics of the ionosphere. So to the Rf and bombs.
Im not going to venture into capacitance fields and rotating plasma masses and stuff like that.
But I think what was going on at the weapons level was fundamentally a manipulation of an energy field. And the techniques for that manipulation may have applications beyond weapons.
And if you look at the official HAARP it says:
"HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.
The HAARP program is committed to developing a world class ionospheric research facility consisting of:
* The Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI), a high power transmitter facility operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. The IRI will be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study.
* A sophisticated suite of scientific (or diagnostic) instruments that will be used to observe the physical processes that occur in the excited region.
Observation of the processes resulting from the use of the IRI in a controlled manner will allow scientists to better understand processes that occur continuously under the natural stimulation of the sun."
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/gen.html
Does the HAARP array look faimilar ? (Just a question)
Ok heres a polar map of Cs 137 fallout map. The ions from high altitude detonations follow the flux lines to earth. There were not that many. Otherwise it would have been worse. They are beta emitters (the fission fuels are alpha emitters) . But the charge of the particle determines its path in the plasma field. The earth's flux lines provide the cyclotron like guidance.
http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/cesium_ ... 95_figures
Most of what you see there is just ordinary fallout. Its still there.
Its all perfectly safe. ((Teller, 1954)
But anyway, its my conjecture that HAARP and Plattesville didnt have to dump any particles up there, they just perhaps played and play about with the streams of particles already up there.
If you introduce a beat frequency up there, what will that induce into a sympathetic circuit on the earth? Have a look at the HAARP array again. Excited plasma and sexed coils. This is getting lurid. Why did Star fish Prime blow electrical circuits from Hawaii to New Zealand?
The sun does the same thing in differing orders of magnitude esp during flares. If you manipulate the ion flow by pulsed RF can you use it to provide induced juice ordinarily?
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Eart ... 2851.shtml
I admit Im a bit of a simpleton when it gets to the technicalities. But I have a cordless shaver that charges up by proximity to its plugged in base station. Theres no electrical pin connection between the shaver and its base. it charges by induction. I realise Haarp is a bit more complicated than my shaver. But is the principle applicable?
