The Parallel Universe

hello,
is anyone still using this. Iwould like to commuicate about the subject of gravit.

Hi.I saw your request and I suggest you to click in this urlgo to the link lifters or search in its search engine

Hi Urich, which part of gravity would you like to discuss - it's a heavy subject!!!

make it lighter!!

hello

I am doing an arts-science residency in a forest, working with an engineer who's getting a bit scared of helping us make a charged sheath vortex aswell as discussing science/art/pseudoscience trickery. there's an explanation in part of what we're up to on scansite.org (in the projects link) and would be gratedul for any help in theories about how to make a force field.

thanks

Kyp

hello

I am doing an arts-science residency in a forest, working with an engineer who's getting a bit scared of helping us make a charged sheath vortex aswell as discussing science/art/pseudoscience trickery. there's an explanation in part of what we're up to on scansite.org (in the projects link) and would be gratedul for any help in theories about how to make a force field.

thanks

Kyp

what's he scared of?

BTW I'm glad these forums are here. Lets make some stuff. ANyone here made any of his patents? if so what are the results you found

i have built what is a modern vertion of the electrokinetic device.

the lifter, very cheap and crude. but i have built one very impressive to wach it just up and floats away! but i had some dificulty, as a result i now hold the world record for highest altitude flight. 7000 feet and it almost didnt fly.... some one posted a link earlyer to the site with the best information on lifters, http://www.jlnlabs.org i think..... anyway a very good site with some of the most cutting edge lifters out there. mine is not listed because it was destroyed durning flight. but some of the worlds heavyest payload lifters are. including the 100 g payload lifter by Savior. wich has a truly impressive efficency record and payload.

What is this thing called mass? Pondering this apparently simple question, two scientists have come up with a radical theory that could explain the nature of inertia, abolish gravity and, just possibly, lead to bizarre new forms of spacecraft propulsion.

The link was removed so I can't go any further and time has gone by since I first put this message up

Sorry folks

To: [email protected]
From: "ALEXANDRIS NIKOS" <[email protected]> Add to Address Book
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:49:20 -0000
Subject: [newelectrogravity] gravity in Wien low and Stefan-Boltzman low


We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript, "Electromagnetic
interaction of gravity. Proposal for unified field theory." (number
309) with author Nikos Alexandris has been accepted for publication
in AOIJ.
Bourgas "Prof. Assen Zlatarov University" - Bulgaria.
April 2006
Academic Open Internet Journal, ISSN 1311-4360
http://www.acadjournal.com

Sep. 30, 2006: Anyone would be confused by &#55402;&#56364; and will think that
it is &#55410;&#56354;ut it uses the S. I. System of units. S.I is a chemical
system linked to Avogadro's number and hydrogen . The interesting
thing is that I found a relation with Avogadro's number and the
proton and the length of charge. I do not have any proof whether &#55402;&#56380;br> is &#55362;&#56430;d how the units come to this constant .

This paper in conclusion says that the model of unification includes
two separate systems in an asymmetry position and in interaction. The
systems are not independent and must interact. Really, there is a 5%
divergence of energy in one system, that may relate to the two
systems. The first system has the three forces that we know in our
world: electromagnetic, gravity and electricity. The second system
has the known thermal energy and an unknown that I call a remnant
force. The thermal force pushes the system and the remnant attracts
the system. The first system has 6 dimensions of space and the second
8 dimensions of space.
On the other hand I found the division of 10/12. The 12 I believe,
consists of the two dimensions of time and my belief comes from my
book on philosophy and not from my paper.
In the temperature of the proton
must use length 1fm or 1fm/sqrt(2.&#55398;&#56353;nd the division of
n1/n2=12/10 , ͽ1, we need to verify if n1=3 and n2=4 in some
experiment. If that happens, there arises that in Planck's
temperature, the n2=12 must consist of 2 dimensions of time.

The most interesting thing in the calculations of the paper is that
we can verify by experimental or by observing a spectrum. The
empirical form of angular momentum and the energies gives us the
potential for calculating spectra.

The proof of theory

Also the relation of length and temperature gives us the hope of
examining whether the system works at low temperarures T.lg =
5,755ױ0^-3.m. K . The system seems to work at the Planck temperature
as the proton's temperature in a diversity of 10^32.K- 10^12.K - why
not the lower of them?
It is interesting that we can get values near to cosmological
irradiation . line 171 of paper
T.lg = 5,755ױ0^-3.m. K , this constant is the half of Wien constant (
1893 )and it is the same for N=6 , the reasan may be that boltzman
low and wien low are valid for low speed of oscilations .
high speed lg=sqrt(2.&#55398;&#57248;lc ,
n1/n2=12/10 , N=3 then lg=1mm then T=5,75K
if radiation comes from lc=1mm Then T=2K
For low speed are valid the low of Wien
and l=1mm , the constant is the half and T=2,73K

The line 102 of paper is the Wien low for
Wien constant = constant102/ 2.sqrt(2&#55399;&#57122;r> for N=1 , n1/n2=12/10
sqrt(2.&#55398;&#56355;omes from values of length .

in line 171
constant171= 2.constant of Wien
also Stefan-Boltzman low gives 73K but this comes from low speed the
right is 73K/2^4=4,5K , in area of cosmic bachground radiation .

a mathematical wrong of fixing will be in any method 2&#55476;&#57262;(n1/n2),
N=3,n1=12,n2= 10

In conclusion all black bodies in nature have n1=12 and n2=10 numbers
and gravity is not zero

If that happens the extra dimensions exist around us

Two more empirical types of angular momentum that do not exist in the
paper and give us the potential of meg existence , are :
meg of 5.1a), line 108 of paper
&#55479;&#56558;14..,c:velocity of light ,lplank:length of plank , h: plank
constant , le:length of charge 5.29x10^-11. m , Na:avogadro' s number

a) 2&#55418;&#56885;meg).c.lplank/ h=1.071
2&#55418;&#56886;meg).c.( le/Na)/h= 6.986

function is analysed as (7/6)J=(2/3) J+(1/2)J
These empirical types will give us the potential of spectrum
verification .

all the method includes a mathematical extraction of Stefan-Boltzman(
T4 ) or Wien low of irradiation of a black body

full article in http://www.cergloba l.org


NOTE: THIS ITEM WAS COPIED DIRECTLY FROM THE WEBSITE FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES AT A LATER DATE.
Trickfox

Trickfox,

I kind of just stumbled over here. Hope you don't mind. I went to the site you referenced and tried to slug through the math but couldn't handle it, sorry! Guess my mind works with pictures better, not equations.

But I went to that site and typed in gravity and the author you referenced before has developed another paper.

http://www.acadjournal.com/2008/V22/part3/p1/ wrote:By the below analysis arises the substance of fine structure constant and the connection of mole of proton with gravity, also prediction of neutrino energy. using the law of Stefan-Boltzman and our function , we have results in agreement with MCB radiation while Wien’s law cannot. We can propose a model for universe in extra dimension and the connection of proton and positron in a process of particle creation.

And it's full of math like the first one, but it also has an interesting picture...



Now Sir Oliver Lodge had a lot of heartburn about the proton in his book Ether & Reality. This paper may explain it better.
This paper also talks about particle creation and an extra dimension. I must study this further, but you bookmarked that back in 2006, Trickfox. It may be time to dust off the paper and review it again...

MagicBill

Gravity waves as a weapon?

If you think the idea of gravitational waves propelling interplanetary spacecraft sounds like science fiction, you're in good company - any astrophysicist will rubbish the idea out of hand.

However, that didn't stop the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) from commissioning a report to investigate whether the elusive waves could pose a threat to US security.

The JASON Defense Advisory Group were also asked to judge whether high-frequency gravitational waves could image the centre of the Earth, or be used for telecommunications.

Gravitational waves are ripples in space-time caused by the movement of an extremely large mass, such as a very dense star.


http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... sense.html

Nevertheless, the JASON team was asked to consider a funding proposal from US company GravWave to the DIA that claimed humans could generate strong gravitational waves on Earth, using the Gertsenshtein effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitatio ... _detectors

The usual Gertsenshtein effect[8] involves the generation of gravitational waves by electromagnetic waves under the influence of a strong static magnetic field. In this case the gravitational waves produced will have the same frequency as the electromagnetic waves producing them.

Gravity waves produced by strong static magnetic field....same frequency as em waves....MATCHING!
skyfish