Again context is totally opposite of what I intended, especially the answer all questions process.FM No Static At All wrote:I grew up in Philadelphia, with lots of neighborhood kids.Junglelord wrote: I am used to not fitting in and prefere that.
I would rather hang out with a herd of horses any day.
Thats how I grew up, on a horse farm, big farm no neighbour kids.
Just me and the horses, cows, chickens, deer, wolf, fox, groundhogs, beavers, etc.
I grew up beside a Provincal Park.
Maybe Linda understands that.
Horses and I understand each other perfectly.
I spent many hours treating professional race horses.
My ability to communicate is better with animals.
I have dsylexia, so I spell bad.
I was not the one they picked first to play ball, yet I learned to play the game(s) well enough to be better than most.
Because I was the "good" kid, most of the other kids picked on me.
I too worked with race horses. I learned to ride them and eventually rode and won a couple of races. I still find that animals are attracted to me and I always have maintained a mutual respect with them. Perhaps it is my love of life, but that is philosophical and this is about science and character, particularly the science and character of T. Townsend Brown.
I do not feel that you are being "picked" on or ragged on because of your theories or ideas. I do feel that you are reacting to the inquiries and comments made by some of us, Mr. Mikado specifically, in a way that is without respect for his opinions and views, although they are not in opposition with your own.
For me personally, it is difficult to ask questions and have an intelligent dialogue with you, not because I feel your science is wrong, but your attitude towards others that question you, leaves much to be desired. I don'[t have any quarrel with your science. I offer you alternatives, not to show that my ideas or opinions are more right than your, but to allow you the opportunity to see things from a perspective outside of your own. If you feel I, and the others that question you, are wrong, show us where we stray from truth.
While I have yet to fully grasp the possibilities of time postulated by N. A. Kozyrev, it does seem apparent (at least to me) that what physics ascribed to the "dimension" of time may be all wrong. I don't know that to be fact, but it does raise questions which cannot be answered until we have experimental evidence. And that is what Mr. Mikado has asked of you. "Where is the proof?" Have you applied your APM to any experiments? Is there a practical application or device you designed that demonstrates the APM in the "real" world?
I personally do not have the time or the inclination to test each new theory that comes along, yet I remain open to new ideas and theories about physics and particularly about the creation and function of the universe. You will find that I have not eliminated any of your APM theories, I am looking at them and waiting for your to climb down from your soap box and show us why you feel APM is more right than other aether theories. Is that being unreasonable?
I am only here to learn, and share. I offer nothing "new". Just Reorganized.
I never said I was right.
People assume I think that.
I do not.
APM is not mine, nor do I have any contribution to APM beyond the fact I recognized that APM was a tensegrity principle.
I shared this with Dave Thompson as he was teaching me and would answer all questions.
I met Dave via Dave Talbott, Dave Smith and the Electric Universe Forum aka Thunderbolts.
I took three months to learn APM. I also had many other elements come together via my introduction to Thunderbolts and the EU. This was why they asked me to review APM. I was sent the book Secrets of the Aether edition 3 and did my homework. I presented that in my thread. Q&A Secrets of the Aether thread.
I figured since APM did not have a Q&A in the book, that it was good study tool, a contribution to maybe the fourth edition and was also my way of making exams when I taught Medical Concepts in college and had to write exams. The information is not any different, it is only reorganized. The request for me to redefine SI units is redundent. Request for me to explain Angular Momentum beyond my Q&A is really for the person to learn, as it is again a well defined unit. I can only say that the definitions are not changed in any way. Quantum spin aka Primary Angular Momentum, is what it is. We think their definitions are correct, just mixed up organization.
I can only say for myself that APM makes total sense to me. I often see "definition" as the first stumbling block to this model. The next stumbling block is "proof". If you learned the model, then the proof is what we all believe in the first place. It is SI units. The definitions do not change. It is accepted science based on accepted measurments of quantum size.
This is then the new starting place to organize the Dimensions, Constants, Units, Measurements.
Quantum Constant, become Quantum Structure via quantum measurements from quantum units via quantum dimensions.
This is important to me as I worked 15 years with a structure and function model that used gravity as the tool.
Structure and function cannot be seperated. Tensegrity is the principle of fascial tissue, virus, matter.
I am a second generation student of Fuller. Synergetics is comparative to APM. Structure is the key to all knowledge.
Thats my opinion. Since APM is the first Quantum Structure Model, I am very interested in how it gives me everything I was looking for in a TOE.
Animals are my favorite study. I am a life long naturalist. I have spent years observing and learning many things by watching Nature. The Science of Bird Song is a favorite study of mine. I have had the pleasure of owing two horses and having a total of 6 to 10 horses on the farm. Working with horses in an orthopedic sense is a experience that transcends almost all things I have experienced. The connection to healing and manuel therapy via a tensegrity model is very convincing when treating a horse. A horse does not have a placebo effect.