AM wrote:If the Caroline Group arent dissenters, well Im not interested.
COULDN'T AGREE MORE!
At this stage in the proceedings, Im having trouble with the technicalities.
So Ive defaulted to my ideological position, and in that, I concure with your earlier statements of concern of an economic nature.
Money is means by which the masses transact with the powers that be.
And in that there is always a conflict or tension between those who value the individual and those who would put the collective first.
And so there is a group who would release this technology and a group who would continue to conceal it.
As for my theory re the transmutation of neutrinos. Well it makes sense to me. Am still looking. If it can be shown that certain circuits result in neutrinos being pushed into them and transmuted into electrons in such a way as to do work within that circuit in can be shown that over unity devices are not really that. A clue is that the Gunn diode circuit shows a pause and then a period of oscillation and a pause and so on.
As if that which is being fed in depletes, and then builds back up and so on.
In my search for a neutrino transmutation circuit I came across that Martian character and thought, oh yeah, a beta ray gun. Never runs out of ammo. Whimsy.
Conventionally the solar fusion reaction is put down to gravity as the main thing.
A hydrogen bomb is put down to implosion forces of the fission trigger.
The fundamental thing is to enable nuclear forces to work and that is a proximity thing. It doesnt matter how it is done, the two protons have get close enough to overcome their electrical repulsion. Passed that threshold, the nuclear force is invoked.
Is there a way of overcoming the electrical repulsion of two protons and in so doing invoking the nuclear force which does not involve the application of "brute force"?
Most of our discussions have electrons as the primary focus. ie negative ions.
fusion is the result of the interaction of protons. ie positive ions.
It is I think quite easy to accelerate negative ions. It is harder to accelerate positive ions.
However, there may be some mechanism whereby the movement of negative ions through a positive ion field would induce fusion adjacent to the track of the negative ions.
This might occur by means of lateral vectors at 90 degrees to the electron primary vector.
As an example imagine a TV tube containing a positive ion plasma. Turn the TV on. The track of the electron beam issued by the electron gun would be truncated by the electron capture of the positive ions. But prior to that, there would be distance travelled by the high speed electrons into the plasma.
The positive ions move rapidly toward the track, having been attracted by the strongly negative passage of the electrons. But they miss. They are moving towards the track from 360 degrees around the track. So there is a fair number of disturbed positive ions - protons. Instead of picking up the electron, they miss, and collide with each other. If the combined velocity is high enough, electrical repulsion is overcome, invoking the nuclear force, fusion in a tv tube.
Maybe.