The Trickfox Files 2025: Burning Oxide, Semiconductor Junctions, and Encrypted Plasma.

[Henry_Yang]

Recently I have been pondering the similarity of these two quotes. Here they are, copied from a post I made myself 13 months ago.

"Yeah, I know. There's no data on those disks. What that is, is that is a subset of VAX B.M.S., OK? What I do is I modify some of the VAX BMS routines to activate a one time pad encryption scheme. That's why I have to have two RL02 drives on the VAX 11730, because one RL02 Platter is a system planner, the other one is the one time pad. The data is on a 1625 BPI 9 track tape on the TU80 tape drive. That's the system configuration."

- Michael Riconosciuto, in an interview with Cheri Seymour, author of The Last Circle

RASP is a computer crunching program for a custom modified set of DEC VAX 11780 processors (which was in place in 1982) The twin vaxes were set to crunch out a very special spread sheet, and the output from one computer was fed into a laser by way of a Brewster modulation window. The lasers from the second computer was also modulated by another Brewster window, then the two beams were collided at orthogonal angles. The rest is a bit more complicated but involves high voltages and the BB effect. This whole deal was a set up to explore Hilbert space for a crumb trail...... Remember Ong's hat? This was a bit like that.
I'm not sure I understand all the details because I figured this technology out later after the Bald Eagle was put in a cage.
Water under the bridge......

- Raymond Lavas, in a post exclusive to this forum, under his internet handle, "Trickfox"



Cross referencing the collaborating information, looking for the intersections in which they extend each other, was a perfectly valid, and possibly the most easiest and exciting way, to crack the ultimate truth of the Biefield-Brown effect.

In Michael's comment, he does not mention the DEC VAX 11780. Instead, he mentions the VAX B.M.S, which stands for "Battery Management System" and consists of a battery pack, which can be broken down into charged battery cells. He also mentioned the RL02 drive, which is a servo tracking disk with a removable 10MB data cartridge. It was made for the PDP computers and up to four can be used on one controller system at a time.

So as he said, he uses two RL02 drives, apparently compatible with a VAX 11730. The actual data is on a track tape stored in a tape drive, which is encrypted by the modified Battery Management System and the two controlling RL02 drives.

I believe Raymond Lavas talks about the exact same system. Although he said it was on a set of TWO computers, each a VAX 11780, as opposed to the original single VAX 11730. Let's call them "Bob" and "Alice". "Bob" complies data and sends that his personal data out as a laser. This laser carries that information because Bob used his Brewster window to put it in there. Alice does the same thing, sending out her data as another separate laser. This involves her modulating the frequency of her own private laser data stream with her own separate Brewster window as well. When these collide at orthogonal angles, they are encrypted. I assume Bob is the system planner and Alice is the master encryptor. By that I mean that Alice is the one-time pad that interacts with the battery system.

You may be asking, how did Lavas and Riconosciuto achieve such a modulation of the laser light in the first place? Well, the Brewster window must be electrostatically modulated itself, and this electrostatic field covering the Brewster window changes the polarization of the light using a servo loop feedback mechanism.

To apply an electrostatic field to a Brewster window, one must look no further than the Biefield-Brown effect, which can be created using the probe patented by Oscar C Blomgren at Interprobe. There must have been two of these, one for Bob and one for Alice. I assume they had the same battery pack, but they could be separate as well. I don't think that matters.

Now for high voltages. This is where the VAX 11780 system becomes itself very important. The only place in that system where high voltages are allowed is in the PROM bit cell.

The bit cell is programmed by applying a high-voltage pulse not encountered during a normal operation across the gate and substrate of the thin oxide transistor (around 6 V for a 2 nm thick oxide, or 30 MV/cm) to break down the oxide between gate and substrate. The positive voltage on the transistor's gate forms an inversion channel in the substrate below the gate, causing a tunneling current to flow through the oxide. The current produces additional traps in the oxide, increasing the current through the oxide and ultimately melting the oxide and forming a conductive channel from gate to substrate. The current required to form the conductive channel is around 100 μA/100 nm2 and the breakdown occurs in approximately 100 μs or less.

- Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_ROM

redirected from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAX-11

As you can see, a high voltage is applied distinctly by the PROM information system in order to blow fuses. The current permanently alters the states of the logic gates. Unlike RAM, PROM can only be used once and the data burned onto it is permanent and irremovable.

These high voltages are not necessary anywhere else in the VAX system. They are needed to allow communication between the logic gate and the substrate, which requires a breakdown of the oxide layer into a transistor. The oxide actually burns itself because of its high conductivity, which then forms a permanent channel between logic gate and the substrate. The oxide is fully conductive at the point it begins quantum tunneling.

Didn't someone say something about the Biefeild-Brown effect producing OZONE?

Anyway, when Raymond Lavas says

This whole deal was a set up to explore Hilbert space for a crumb trail...... Remember Ong's hat? This was a bit like that.

I assume he means that the quantum tunneling is affected by the Brewster window modulation. If Alice is the one time pad, then the laser outcoming from Bob should be the system configuration controller, saying what needs to be burned. Alice's laser encrypts it and carries the key for decryption within itself.

The VAX 11730 has a similar set-up to what Lavas described, but it uses Fiber Diffraction, which can be read by either the Picker and Huber Diffractometers. However, when Riconosciuto used the Blomgren probe to allow the Biefield-Brown affect to modulate the frequency of both beams, he set in motion a method of oxide burning where Alice's PROM is burned by Bob's Brewster window and corresponding electrostatic field.

Then Lavas says this:

The cooling Probe used on Bragg cell channelizers presents a much more useful application of this high voltage control technology. There are several dozen novel applications planned but the most important to me personally is the possibility of temporarily reversing the second laws of thermodynamics to cause a truly strange time manipulation process. I call it "looping the singularity".

Now keep in mind that the original electrostatic cooling probe was invented by Irving Langmiur, who went on to create monoatomic hydrogen with it. Langmuir's probe created a boundary layer of monoatomic hydrogen that was one atom thick across the length of his burning filament.

The Biefield-Brown effect is exemplified in the Blomgren probe, where this same kind of boundary layer sucks out the energy of the lit filament. But it is not the ions carrying it away, because they are always too heavy to make such a strong wind. As with Langmuir's probe, the affect comes from the conductivity of the plasma. This is similar to the quantum tunneling effect in the oxide in the PROM information system. The individual ions are not a part of the effect.

The thermodynamics, as Caratheodory noted, can be modeled as a Pfaffian system. When the Pfaffian curve values are plotted into a classical phase space, the choatic attractor of the plasma can be derived. The chaos, characterized by entropy, is modeled by the attractor's singularities, which always follow some kind of symmetry.

A Bragg cell, set in place of the crystalline substrates of a Fiber Diffraction system, could hypothetically work with Blomgren's probe. But I cannot calculate the thermodynamic effect as such, only speculate that at a high voltage, the tunneling effect takes the same exact effect that it did in Riconosciuto's modified VAX system. This would create an increased Lyapunov constant across the frequency distribution of the processing speed of the data and code in itself, causing a nonlinear development in parallel processing applications.

But enough speculation. Let's go over what we know about this already. It's been a year, after all. Time to repost the information and keep it fresh.

The METC was patented by Oscar C Blomgren, although he did not explain the effect in any detail, nor mention the anomalies associated with it.

1. METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOWERING THE TEMPERATURE OF A HEATED BODY (#3,224,497)
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis ... 224497.pdf

2. COOLING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HEAT EXCHANGERS (#3,872,917)
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis ... 872917.pdf

3. METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTRIC ARC WELDING UTELIZING HIGH VOLTAGE, LOW CURRENT ELECTROSTATC COOLING (#3,757,079)
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis ... 757079.pdf

It was NateCull that originally pointed these out. He also was the one to discover the following quotes on Paul's blog.

FROM https://www.ttbrown.com/brown-and-tesla/

BY Raymond Lavas

Let me tell you about the two demonstrations we performed at the University of Colorado in March 2001.
Take a look!!
http://www.psychopropulseur.com/downloads/img/METC1.gif
We demonstrated “a fan with no moving parts”
SOUNDS FAMILIAR DON’T IT?
That was just a warm up to the more important “cooling” experiment in which we managed to cool the center of a light bulb filament while it remained lit on both sides of the area being quenched.
REMEMBER we did this THROUGH A GLASS LIGHT BULB in which THE AIR HAS BEEN EVACUATED.(so much for the “ion wind cooling effect” right!).
Some science experts that we demonstrated this to just scratched their heads and said “well that’s impossible”.
HERE IS A PHOTO OF THE ACTUAL EXPERIMENT UNDER WAY.
http://www.psychopropulseur.com/downloa ... LBDEMO.GIF
Does any of this sound familiar to anyone else here????
Here is a photo of the METC we used in both experiments.
http://www.psychopropulseur.com/downloads/img/power supply_Green copy.jpg
An METC unit (Modular Energy Transfer Catalyzer) is a DC high voltage power supply which has specialized pulse width modulation control inputs, and a precision current feedback loop control circuit built in.
It’s the “electronic control circuitry” which is connected EXTERNALLY to the METC unit that performs all the “magic”.
Here is a “Building plan” of the HV probe we used to perform the light bulb experiment with:
http://www.psychopropulseur.com/downloa ... VPROBE.GIF
This whole demonstration was just a method devised to stump those scientists who “THOUGHT” they knew what was going on with the physics of an “ion wind generator” ala “sharper image”(what a joke).
There was NO AIR in the light bulb, so HOW COULD AN ION WIND COOL ANYTHING inside an evacuated bulb???

Because it is not an ionic wind effect. The probe is using a servo-loop that modulates the data and thus the entropy. This is the

“electronic control circuitry” which is connected EXTERNALLY to the METC unit that performs all the “magic"

Which is was first exemplified in the encryption scheme by Riconosciuto.


Lavas claims that this experiment generated real data and scientific proof of an undeniable thermodynamic conspiracy, not to mention a breakthrough in surface chemistry that Langmuir himself would envy...

FROM viewtopic.php?p=15011&hilit=filament#p15011

BY Trickfox AKA Raymond Lavas

I have a Tektronics 496P so with the correct waveguides I could tell you if you are creating dangerous harmonics and a perhaps I could design a "Soft-Start Circuit" to eliminate your problems,.....But OH....You probably need the proper design for a multipurpous transformer and A pulse shapping electronic control circuit with an auto spark-quenching circuit hey?

How about calculating the force necessary to reach over unity?

Are you reversing the second law of thermodynamics? Sort-of pushing back ENTROPY ITSELF A BIT!!!

What if we decided to put on a REAL INTERESTING show of the energy control aspects of this High Voltage science?

What if I could turn off the center of a long light bulb filament while it shines red on both sides of the exact spot where I am cooling it. (Through the glass) What if the calculated and measured energy used to produce the high voltage of my cooling probe is lower than the energy required to keep the bulb lit.

Now let's revisit this forum post again:

viewtopic.php?t=6&start=30

"The cooling Probe used on Bragg cell channelizers presents a much more useful application of this high voltage control technology. There are several dozen novel applications planned but the most important to me personally is the possibility of temporarily reversing the second laws of thermodynamics to cause a truly strange time manipulation process. I call it "looping the singularity"."

Perhaps the forward arrow of time only exists relative to our speed of information processing. To process information at the speed of light would be to freeze it into a state of "the eternal now", aka the static photon. When I read this suggestion by Raymond Lavas, years ago, I have never stopped wondering about it. The Blomgren probe creates surface anaolies in the material of the Brewster windows that can speed up or slow down the polarized light. In other words, photons interacting with other photons that then interact with other photons that interacted with other photons. Encrypted in the second interaction and entangled by the third.

Let's look at Michael Riconosciuto's initial reporting on the Blomgren probe effect, aka the Biefield-Brown effect.

Also, it was thanks to NateCull that this article was found.

"Electrostatic Cooling: Science Fact or Fiction?"
by Michael Riconosciuto
http://www.rexresearch.com/blomgren/blomgren.htm

[after discussing the F-111 jet and the anomaly of Blomgren's electrostatic cooling discovery]

"Careful experimental analysis of the boundary layer thermal transfer effect confirmed that heat transfer was indeed substantially enhanced when the electrostatic field disrupted the boundary layer. The boundary layer was found to act as an effective thermal impedance to both radiative and convective thermal transfer from the surface of the wing pin."

"The total heat dissipation actually measured in the experimental set-ups could not be immediately reconciled with the Second Law of thermodynamics, Joule's Law and Fourier's theorems on heat flow, and the Conservation laws of physics."

"My work on this project started with a heat transfer phenomenon that had been accidentally discovered by Oscar Blomgren Jr. I succeeded in completely reconciling the observed experimental results with the apparent violations of the laws of physics. The work that I completed can be summarized as mathematical modeling and numerical simulation with application of the boundary value problems of thermodynamics based on second order partial differential equations derived from elliptic functions"

Description from Rex Research:

"There are three conventional ways to transfer heat: Conduction, Convection, and Radiation. Now there is a fourth way, Electrostatic Cooling (ESC), that has been discovered and patented by Oscar C. Blomgren (Sr. & Jr.) and others. Negative ion probes are placed near a heated object, which is grounded. When high voltage is applied, there is a dramatic drop in temperature. This extremely simple system reduces or eliminates the need for other methods, and it uses very low power and is very efficient. It also facilitates heating when applied in reverse!"

I wonder if Brown himself discovered this Bragg cell and kept quiet about it. He died in 1985, but supposedly, Michael Riconosciuto built the Bob and Alice twin modified VAX computers in 1982. There's a three year window of a possible direct connection.

And to reiterate once again, I believe that the best way to crack the mystery of Thomas Townsend Brown is to look at this connection and take into account all of the clues provided by Raymond Lavas on Michael Riconosciuto's work. Riconosciuto said he learned about the Biefield-Brown effect from working at Learjet, owned by Bill Lear. Raymond Lavas, on the other hand, said he was introduced to it by Robert Maheu, owner of Hugh's aircraft, and friend of Robert Booth Nichols.

Now, Robert Booth Nichols and John Lear (the son of Bill Lear) where well acquainted with one another. I even talked to John about it before he died. It led to a massive financial rabbit hole involving an offshoot of BCCI that is still around today, and a split-off society that hordes their wealth... But this forum is not for any of those kinds of subjects... I just want to point them out casually to say that the degrees of separation are closing in, and as they do, the dots connect, and this technology will not remain in the dark forever.


PS: Bonus note; Did anybody else notice the Penrose diagram of the Einstein-Rosen bridge on the NRO-11 badge? The one that Raymond Lavas himself used as a personal symbol on his blog, which mysteriously marked the Richat flat (world's largest Barium mine) on it with the singularity intersection point?

[natecull]

Hi Henry, and thanks again for posting.

I want to first say, as a computer guy, that I think you're way over-complicating the VAX tapes part of the Michael R and Raymond Lavas story, as was done by multiple journalists writing about "The Octopus" over decades and getting things terribly wrong. Let me try to untangle the tangles that I understand.

This first quote is a transcription of audio, and it's not been transcribed correctly. That transcription error has sent you down a false path.

There's no data on those disks. What that is, is that is a subset of VAX B.M.S., OK? What I do is I modify some of the VAX BMS routines to activate a one time pad encryption scheme. That's why I have to have two RL02 drives on the VAX 11730, because one RL02 Platter is a system planner, the other one is the one time pad. The data is on a 1625 BPI 9 track tape on the TU80 tape drive.

The word that's being said is not "VAX BMS" but "VAX VMS". Nothing to do with any Battery Management System, sorry, and that means looking at the electrical details of VAX batteries will not help you.

VMS ("Virtual Memory System") is the official VAX operating system, like say DOS or Windows of the 1970s ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenVMS ) Fun fact, Windows NT was actually developed by the designer of VMS, Dave Cutler, because Microsoft hired him. So there's elements of the VMS architecture that do live on in Windows. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Cutler ) That's a digression and is not relevant to the Michael R story.

It's also not "system planner" but "system platter". Hard drives were called "platters" back in the 1970s. (Roughly; a drive could have multiple platters, but that's not important). "System platter" means what we'd now call the system volume.

Michael R by all accounts was a fairly skilled hacker as of the 1970s/1980s and it makes sense that he was entangled with the NSA somehow - the "bugs" for data exfiltration that he claimed to have planted in, eg, PROMIS are techniques that were revealed as NSA tricks by Edward Snowden a decade ago. What he's saying here is that he hacked up his own encrypted disk. Today, on Windows say, you'd use Bitlocker. In the 1980s, you'd have to homebrew the equivalent yourself. And that's what Michael R is saying he did. He had two disk drives. One was VAX VMS (the operating system). The other was just a bunch of random data - the "one-time pad". You'd just XOR them together on read or write. (As he says he patched the library routines to do). Very simple, and it means if you pull that second disk out, or erase it, the main system disk is unreadable.

So that 1970s or 1980s VAX setup, with encrypted disks and tapes, that has absolutely nothing to do with RASP or with whatever weird Biefeld-Brown Effect stuff may or may not have been later going on, possibly decades later, with lasers. It's just a basic hacker computer security thing. Again: just think Bitlockered hard drive. Nothing more than that.

For the rest of your argument, I'm going to have to look closely at it, but I need to parse out your misassumptions from this one-time pad thing first.


1. "I figured this technology out later after the Bald Eagle was put in a cage"

I assume "the Bald Eagle" was Michael R. Does this reference mean that Raymond was saying that Michael R was a member of the infamous "Aviary" and that BALD EAGLE was his nickname? Or is it just an injoke referring to something else?


2. Blomgren, Interprobe, and electrostatic cooling: Yep that seems to be a legit technology and probably used for welding Stealth planes and probably why it's classified. Whatever Raymond was onto about it having something to do with reversing entropy, I have no idea. I'm open to the idea that something weird is happening there. I'm not however necessarily jumping to lots of conclusions about what that something weird might be. If there's something there, then let's first establish what that is and how it works before we go directly to quantum reverse entropy time travel.


However, fun synchronicity: earlier this month I was looking at the Electrohydrodynamics trail over here ( viewtopic.php?p=22983#p22983 ) and stumbled on this 1999 DTIC paper ( https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA366241.pdf )

EFFECT OF PROLONGED ELECTROHYDRODYNAMIC (EHD) EXPOSURE ON AVIATION WORKINGFLUIDS
JOHN S. PASCHKEWITZ
MECHANICAL AND THERMAL SYSTEMS BRANCH
TATLAB
BLDG. 45 ANNEX
2130 8™ STREET, STE 1
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH 45433-7542

which references what seems to be a synonym for electrostatic cooling: "electrohydrodynamic heat transfer enhancement". As part of that study, Paschkewitz is testing synthetic oil and Fluorinert by zapping both with high voltage to see if that damages their insulating properties at all.

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) enhancement is a promising technique for making large improvements in heat transfer, particularly in single-phase liquids or gases, which are typically act as dominant heat transfer resistances. Application of an intense (kV/cm) electrical field to allow conductivity (typically nS/m) liquid will generate secondary motion in the fluid (Fernandez andPoulter, 1987). The resulting secondary flow yields an increase in heat transfer. This increase in heat transfer can then be exploited to reduce heat exchanger surface area and volume.

Paschkewitz in 1999 is writing however as if "EHD enhancement" is not a technology currently being used by the USAF, which doesn't quite square with Raymond Lavas' claims about it being used in the 1970s for welding. Unless perhaps that was just one tiny application in a highly managed space. The impression one gets from this paper is that the USAF, thirty years later, was still not really trusting the technique for heat management, but was ready to look at expanding use of the technique to bigger systems.

Nate

[Henry_Yang]

Dear NateCull,

Thank you for the clarification. My mental health is not the best right now, but it always makes me happy to have light shed on the dark mysteries of the universe, at any time. That was a joy to read and learn from.

Parsing out my misassumptions from my misunderstanding of the one-time pad comment would erase everything to do with the actual computers. I assumed that on some early VAX or PDP system, Michael R had designed entirely NEW hardware that used the Biefield-Brown effect to some degree to calculate data much faster than perhaps even today's computers. Raymond Lavas made it seem like the Biefield-Brown effect led to a split-off generation of computers that only black ops people even know about, and the physics itself isn't exactly mainstream, so we can't judge it.

On an unrelated note, recently I have been reading about the history of TrueCrypt, which comes from E4M. One thing I could not get out of my mind was that E4M's inventor, Paul Le Roux, was listed in a court filing by Craig Wright as some kind of assistant or co-worker, for some joint project of theirs. Wright was known to be a full-time consultant to Lasseter's Online Casino, and worked in Costa Rica. The multi-billionaire Calvin Ayre also had a stake of Lasseter's and their chain of hotels, and became well-acquainted with Wright at this time. At some point, I believe that Paul Le Roux himself was in Costa Rica, and wrote code under Craig Wright, or belonged to the same team as Wright. Wright and Le Roux have a lot to answer here in this regard, whether or not this has anything to do with the electronic cash system developed at Lasseters that has suspicious similarities to Bitcoin. But perhaps my thinking in that regard is just too influenced by J O Grabbe and his own obsession with that little country that Robert Booth Nichols may or may not be living in currently.

When it comes to Michael's computers again, I wanted to know why the laser beams intersect. I see you answered that question. I thought it was the Biefield-Brown effect and some weird quantum gravity effects as well. I guess I just let the gaps in my understanding grow extra wide before going to fill them in with crazy guesses.

A month ago, I was on the phone with Peter Osborne, who is apparently in daily contact with Michael R, and claimed to me that the Biefield-Brown effect is real and that Michael and Raymond where correct about it. I asked him to explain it to me, and he said it is so complicated, I would never understand it, and therefore he wasn't going to take the time to try. I told him explicitly about Mikado and that one red binder with Michael's papers in it. He wanted a copy to see any leaks had taken place and how severe they might be.

This is the same binder that Raymond Lavas made himself and distributed to members of this forum at private meet ups.

You can see a picture of the cover here.

https://www.ttownsendbrown.com/forum/vi ... =42&t=1341

This is the following note from Mikado:

There are also equations from Riconoscuito for wave propagation between TEM and standing wave which he perceived to be gravitational.

Elsewhere, he (Mikado) claimed that parts of it where plagiarized, but was not specific on what parts. A lot of it was indeed copied from the work of Henning Harmuth, but he was given all due credit.

I have found, through my own research, that Michael Riconosciuto plagiarized from the Stanford researchers, SE Harris, and OP McDuff. This is a paper they wrote called "Theory of FM Laser Oscillation", published in the IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, September 1965:

https://web.stanford.edu/~seharris/Publ ... 960/18.pdf

And this is Riconosciuto's paper:

https://fpparchive.org/media/documents/ ... 95_FBI.pdf

This was taken from the archives of Ted Gunderson, which where compiled by Raymond Lavas, who slipped in the Riconosciuto paper himself.

Well I can see the link isn't working now. See this thread instead where I typed Riconosciuto's writing up by hand:

viewtopic.php?p=22366#p22366


The similarities in Riconosciuto's writing start with the Lamb semi-classical self-consistency field theory. The equations themselves are of the same form, but Riconociuto went as far as copying the EXACT words and language of McDuff.

McDuff confirmed to me that Riconosciuto had nothing to do with the original research project at Stanford.

I figure that he (Riconosciuto) is a genius, but simply when asked to clarify the details of his highly classified work, gave out already existing work done by others, that he could copy given it was in the public domain. And there would be no real consequence from his intelligence handlers for that.

The researcher Marcus G Kuhn, who invented Role-Based Access Controls, described Riconosciuto in a similar way, expressing disappointment that his notes on non-sinusoidal functions came from a common textbook. This particular comment was in a university thesis that I posted about incidentally on that very same thread linked above.


Anyway, I am literally just copying from old threads of mine. I'm trying to make this easier for others to sort through. Again, I will re-iterate the comments from Raymond Lavas. He claimed that:

1) The Biefield-Brown effect was proof that Coulomb's law of electrostatics was wrong

2) At JPL Pasadena, Brown and Kitselman worked to develop a working MHD Drive on this principle

3) Newton's flux calculus, with its notions of infinitesimal rotations and integral approximations, where based on the foundation provided by Coulomb's (wrong) idea that all points are infinitely small and equally attractable, which makes the whole thing wrong.

I feel like there have been made changes to the internet. It is a lot harder to find Raymond's old comments now. You would think it would be easier, given that I know exactly where and what they are. But I'm not finding the reference for these ones. I could probably find it later on, but what matters more is the ideas I think.

And then there is also his claims of Thermodynamics reversal. This may sound impossible, but remember that Irving Langmuir won many prizes in surface chemistry for having invented arc wielding in the first place, complete with a method of producing monoatomic hydrogen from this technology. And Karl Pearson described the forwards facing arrow of time as an artefact of consciousness, and claimed to not believe in thermodynamics at all. This view led to a spacetime where the speed of velocity determined the actual progress of time, and whether or not it went forwards, backwards, or standstill was basically down to the motion of the observer. This influenced Albert Einstein at the time, although he and lots of other people still don't know if it is LITERAL or not.

That was just a warm up to the more important “cooling” experiment in which we managed to cool the center of a light bulb filament while it remained lit on both sides of the area being quenched.
REMEMBER we did this THROUGH A GLASS LIGHT BULB in which THE AIR HAS BEEN EVACUATED.(so much for the “ion wind cooling effect” right!).
Some science experts that we demonstrated this to just scratched their heads and said “well that’s impossible”.
HERE IS A PHOTO OF THE ACTUAL EXPERIMENT UNDER WAY.

Of course the photos are gone.

This whole demonstration was just a method devised to stump those scientists who “THOUGHT” they knew what was going on with the physics of an “ion wind generator” ala “sharper image”(what a joke).
There was NO AIR in the light bulb, so HOW COULD AN ION WIND COOL ANYTHING inside an evacuated bulb???

Note that ion wind can't even do it in an environment with lots of air, due to the heaviness of the ions themselves. They can make some wind, but it's hardly fast or efficient.

What if I could turn off the center of a long light bulb filament while it shines red on both sides of the exact spot where I am cooling it. (Through the glass) What if the calculated and measured energy used to produce the high voltage of my cooling probe is lower than the energy required to keep the bulb lit.

This is the data we need. The person who he said he gave it to, came out in this forum in another one of my threads and told me he never got it. It comes from Raymond's tendency to be secretive yet talk at the same time.

the most important to me personally is the possibility of temporarily reversing the second laws of thermodynamics to cause a truly strange time manipulation process. I call it "looping the singularity"."

Of course, now we are dealing with his private philosophy about the nature of first order logic, which I've gotten into on other threads.

This last quote is from Michael Riconosciuto again:

A series of experiments were conducted with different electrode configurations and grounding arrangements. It was determined experimentally that by "appropriate modulation" of the high voltage field that the electrostatic heat transfer effect could be enhanced by several orders of magnitude. The voltage and current inputs to the hot plate and the voltage and current supplied to the electrostatic cooling probes were monitored during all the experiments.

The uniformity of the bulk cooling effect was immediately confirmed by repeated experimental demonstrations.

Measurements of radiated and convected heat flow away from the glass slab did not come anywhere near accounting for the BTU loss required for the temperature drop of the slab. The total heat dissipation actually measured in the experimental set-ups could not be immediately reconciled with the Second Law of thermodynamics, Joule's Law and Fourier's theorems on heat flow, and the Conservation laws of physics.

Additional theoretical work had to be performed.

Admiral Al Renkin (Retired), and myself demonstrated this heat transfer phenomenon to scientists from the various national laboratories. As amazed as they were, none of the scientists or engineers could accurately characterize the underlying physics of the experimentally observed phenomenon in our demonstrations. At this point the Office of Naval Research proposed that the experimental set-up be changed.

Oscar Blomgren Jr. had succeeded in cooling spots on the filament of a long display case type lightbulb. I was asked if it were possible to cool the entire length of the filament simultaneously, to the same degree as the sections of the filament had been. The answer was yes.

Then ONR wanted to see the numbers on probe energy versus the electrical energy input and thermal and convective heat flow around the filament.

Vacuum and inert gas backfilled lightbulbs were used for this set of experiments. The experimental results were immediately classified and all hell broke out around our project. I suddenly had immense resources in money and personnel made available to our project through DARPA, ONR, and USAF PRAM Project Office.

In the past, and as always, I would like to put emphasis on this:

Michael:

I was asked if it were possible to cool the entire length of the filament simultaneously, to the same degree as the sections of the filament had been. The answer was yes.

Raymond:

What if I could turn off the center of a long light bulb filament while it shines red on both sides of the exact spot where I am cooling it. (Through the glass)

What happens when the entire filament goes out, due to the extremely high voltage? Are the numbers in the data REALLY what Michael R and Raymond Lavas have told us? A strange loop where the energy igniting the probe is way less than the energy the bulb consumes to stay on? But if this energy is taken away by the probe, at an expense that is less than the original energy the light bulb requires, then you have a system where energy is going from high entropy to low entropy without apparent cause, where something that should require a lot of energy is in fact taking less than should be expected.

The differences in Michaels and Raymond's interpretations are as follows:

Michael:

Measurements of radiated and convected heat flow away from the glass slab did not come anywhere near accounting for the BTU loss required for the temperature drop of the slab. The total heat dissipation actually measured in the experimental set-ups could not be immediately reconciled with the Second Law of thermodynamics, Joule's Law and Fourier's theorems on heat flow, and the Conservation laws of physics

Raymond:

The cooling Probe used on Bragg cell channelizers presents a much more useful application of this high voltage control technology. There are several dozen novel applications planned but the most important to me personally is the possibility of temporarily reversing the second laws of thermodynamics to cause a truly strange time manipulation process. I call it "looping the singularity".

and

But OH....You probably need the proper design for a multipurpose transformer and A pulse shaping electronic control circuit with an auto spark-quenching circuit hey?

How about calculating the force necessary to reach over unity?

Are you reversing the second law of thermodynamics? Sort-of pushing back ENTROPY ITSELF A BIT!!!

and also, let me throw in one more:

somewhat independently developed ideas of plasmoid phenomena that match their ideas by learning about ball lightning, and the plasmoids produced in apparatus by those such as Bostick, K. Shoulders, and Matsumoto, and anomalous geophysical phenomena. For example, their idea of MHD waves or Alfven waves seems somewhat like my idea of plasmoid waves. And Lerner described "plasma whirlwinds" and "electromagnetic tornadoes" (page 196), and I think that whirlwinds are plasmoids and have developed ideas about the structure of plasmoids and tornadoes. A drawing by Lerner in his book (page 195) of a "force-free filament" in which electrical current flows along a helical pattern reminds me of a drawing made by a person many decades ago (and shown in a more recent article(15)) of a whirlwind in which the dust and air move in intricate helical patterns. As I have described before, terrestrial plasmoids seem to be associated with anomalously high magnetic-like effects and magnetic-like effects that are anomalous.

I'm afraid the requoting everything makes the originals much harder to find with the search function. But at the same time, my goal is to help them resurface, so it is kind of paradoxical in a way.

Mikado's comment saying that Michael R worked on TEM and standing wave physics reminds me of the Gertsenshtein Effect, but that requires massive magnetic fields beyond what he could have ever produced in a lab. I'm still not sure on how to interpret it, or what to think about Peter Osborne's comments.

He swears, on his own credibility, no less, that the Biefield-Brown effect is real and Michael Riconosciuto knows exactly what it is.

Supposedly, his hundreds of hours of videographic interviews with Raymond Lavas should be forthcoming in his book, "Lethal Justice".

In the past, I have speculated that this exact physical discovery was a factor in the deaths of both Eric Roskos and Danny Casolaro. My analysis on the Roskos death was passed onto the makers of that popular Netflix series, but they couldn't be bothered to write a fifth episode and script it. They also ignored Osborne and Hamilton as sources.

But the worst part is, nobody even asked Sam Israel's opinion.

Sometimes life feels like an actual Shakespearean "Comedy of Errors"...

[Jan Lundquist]

Henry!

So glad to "see" you again, but sorry to hear about that you are not feeling your absolutely best. But even 75% of Henry Wang is better than 100% of most of us.


I plan to get back to your work after the holiday weekend. Thank you for your time and effort.

Take care,
Jan

[Henry_Yang]

Hi Jan!

It's great to hear from you again also! I must warn you that all my recent writings are at a 10% sanity level as opposed to your prior estimate of a 75%. I was gone for most of the year because I was attempting my dream of becoming a research chemist, which failed. And now I am left with almost nothing, my debts spiraling out of control, and too physically disabled to continue.

And this may be too honest, but I admit now that I am starting to feel like my old thoughts and approach to things was unreasonably abstract. A side effect of my insanity.

Some time ago, I had a half-hearted conversation with Dr. Peter J Osborne about INSLAW, Michael Riconosciuto, and the Biefield-Brown effect. He said he had hours of video interviews with Riconosciuto and Lavas and knew for a fact that the Biefield-Brown effect was a legitimate aspect of this story. But he left me with ZERO technical details, and all I have on hand now is the plagiarized Stanford document from "Gunderson's" archive.

BTW, I made a typo in the last post. Dr. Harris is the one that told me Michael Riconosciuto was not involved with the research. I've never talked to Dr. McDuff.

But it is all starting to look to me like Raymond's account is too good to be true. He said that Brown's discovery was used in submarine propulsion, underground mining, pryamider satellites for ultrawideband communications, and on a strange outgrowth of the VAX computer system developed by Riconosciuto himself.

That is four separate things. And he claimed to know all of it for a fact. Last but not least, was his claims on nanotechnology scaling up the effect through synchronized pulses, known today as Active Force Material... He said he knew for a fact that Hughes aircraft was researching it already, and that it worked to change the mass of the proton in any dielectric material. These even crazier claims where made on John Lear's forum.

And due to James F Corum's lectures, I found that Tesla himself worked primarily with Zenneck waves, which I began to believe where the key to Brown's fogless shave mirror, as well as the Riconsciuto-Brewster windows in that mysterious VAX setup. even more crazy theoretical buzzwords entered these rants: Phase conjugation, Bragg cells, etc., which are some of the more oddball "hints" from Raymond Lavas.

And I never stopped abstracting and letting the insanity destroy the basic grammar and structure of my posts! Off of this forum, I continued. So many things I wanted to get a research grant for, and yet I was instead permanently barred from the universities, making my new thesis's entirely ideal and isolated. There where many that contained enough material to stand in at the PhD level; Lyapunov exponents in linguistic Zipf distributions caused by lexeme condensations... Euctatic stars generated from lattice projections in fractal dimensions in nonconvex sphere packings.... Wigner's 6j-symbols as a categorical monoid in the representation space of the octonion algebra..... And on and on it went. Without proof. It was an impossible ideal.

So anyway, while I was at "the fort that is lost in the woods", a man calling himself William Rossier showed up, and I recognized him from a dossier compiled all the way back when from the hand of the great Rodney Stich. Rossier came up out of the papers like a ghost to haunt me in real life, and was probably responsible for that young private whose body was found in the trash.

"Always be faithful to us, and we will never be unfaithful to you", Rossier's final words to me, which was a threat given to me and... let's see... Five Captains, One Major, Two Lieutenant Colonels, One Colonel, and One Command Sargent Major, One 1-star General, and one 2-star General. They deserve to be court-martialed!!!! I wonder which will be the first to go public about the ketamine problem that started all this? None of it was my fault, BTW, I just SAW some things....

Haha, no one will ever come forward. The secrets remain behind their closely guarded gates... Society itself functions like a unicellular Leviathan, taking hints from the underlying field, a subconscious super-field, telling it about when, what, and where is the reality that itself lives in. They ruined my life for trying to report them. The Leviathan controls the quantum possibilities of existence and I was a fool to challenge it.

Counter-intuitively, the only exception to this Big Brotherly rule of all things is the Octopus, a split-off faction straight from the imagination of Ayn Rand, an independent and autonomous entity that BCCI funded, but had really started after Rossier went about installing Johnson as US President all the way back in 1963, having the goal of making a new society with new rules. Soviet Ambassador Jack Matlock almost broke it open. But his information was rejected. Hersch could have done something. Strange, after Trump's release of all the classified files on this subject, none mentioned Matlock at all.

And I know now, only now that it is too late, that the infamous Netflix documentary was most likely just a honey pot operation to close in on Dr. Osborne and shut him up. He was at least somewhat fortunate that his consequences where not as crazy, bloodthirsty, or ridiculous as mine where.

And yet, returning to the star subject of this forum... if I had to take a wild guess, I would wager that Dr. Osborne does not understand the Biefield-Brown effect at all. I know he was not originally aware of Michael Younger, George Green, or the group calling itself COM-12, which did in fact leak out several bombings in Kosovo before they happened. All of which came from Robert Booth Nichols, who exercised full control over the movements of Bill Uhouse, Michael Younger, Dean Radin, and even Ted Gunderson, who organized the COM-12 meeting on his orders. I often explain these things to the Netflix crew, and others, only to find that they act like they know MORE than me later on, despite NEEDING to have been filled in on it earlier.

I say that Dr. Osborne does not understand the Biefield-Brown effect, because BY NOW, he should have leaked it. I emailed Paul about that when I first learned it. And additionally, Dr. Osborne did not want to tell me what Brown's original discovery is, even though he is a senior physicist and cryptographer, with enough knowledge to at the very, very least, attempt to PRETEND to know what a Gaussian beam is and what it has to do with the laser driven effects of a DBD actuator..... As Riconosciuto has done in the past, as documented in my other threads.

Final nail in the coffin is that Dr. Osborne is not aware of the strange events at Pyramid Lake, or who was (HINT: "HELLO STUPID") it that figured out how to reconcile the infinity of Dirac delta functions with the non-unitary aspects of the Glauber–Sudarshan P Representation. Although back then, it didn't go by that name.

For those still following this conversation, "non-unitary" is code for "faster than light". At least, in a technical sense.

And how about the actual historical significance of such things? The NRL was famous for being the first to track satellites from the ground. Including those that where not theirs. This was called MINITRACK and used a Phase-comparison mono-pulse technique using antennas that could reach the ultrawideband level of frequencies, AS COULD BROWN'S loudspeaker invention. Where's Dr. Osborne's video on this? There isn't one...

Wikipedia is telling me that these same kinds of systems utilize the Hanle effect... something to do with overriding the Larmor frequency... Now here are some words that I don't even understand just yet! So this is MY end to understanding Brown's legacy. At least I make what I know public.... Sometimes....

And now my 10% has turned into 5%. I thank any and every person who has every taken the effort to try and understand me.

I hope that wasn't too bad a read......

[natecull]

Thank you for the clarification. My mental health is not the best right now, but it always makes me happy to have light shed on the dark mysteries of the universe, at any time. That was a joy to read and learn from.

Thank you for the kind words! And I'm truly sorry for your health problems and I hope you can get support for them. I know it's tough in America right now, and there's a lot of pressure and anxiety everywhere. Sending you kind thoughts.

On an unrelated note, recently I have been reading about the history of TrueCrypt, which comes from E4M.

Yes, the entire "computer security" industry crosses over both with military intelligence and with criminals. It's a very weird scene, and so I'm not surprised that there are many shady characters involved. The weirdness of that scene is why I give Michael R and Raymond Lavas a fair bit of faith, because many of their weird claims seem weird in a way that matches the real world. But I think sometimes their claims get jumbled up together with each other.

Trying to untangle the jumble, I've found, is a little helpful for one's sanity, but trying to slam one's brain headfirst into it all isn't so much. I first hit the Townsend Brown mythos as a teenager in the 1980s and I had to step back for several decades and clear my head before encountering it again.
Because a lot of the stories spiralling around Townsend Brown, Tesla, MKULTRA, etc, all have roots in reality, but they're also stories told by scared and angry military and ex-military people -- and some of these stories are deliberately designed as weapons to cause confusion and hurt.

So do please take care of yourself.

When it comes to Michael's computers again, I wanted to know why the laser beams intersect. I see you answered that question.

I didn't answer that one, actually! I think the laser beam thing might well be connected to Michael R's weird science experiments, rather than to his disk encryption.

There are also equations from Riconoscuito for wave propagation between TEM and standing wave which he perceived to be gravitational.

Mikado here seems to be describing the "scalar electromagnetics" idea first promoted back in the early 1980s by Tom Bearden, which seems to be a kind of white whale / holy grail chased by a lot of these weird military-adjacent science people. The idea seems to be that if you intersect two beams (of microwaves or lasers, say) you might get some "extra" component to the electromagnetic field. A "longitudinal" rather than "transverse" wave. I really like that idea and I want it to be true and thinking about it it has colonised a large chunk of my (recreational musing) brain, but I am not sure whether it actually is true. But I certainly want it to be.

1) The Biefield-Brown effect was proof that Coulomb's law of electrostatics was wrong

This belief of Michael's is probably that same "scalar" thing again, yes.

2) At JPL Pasadena, Brown and Kitselman worked to develop a working MHD Drive on this principle

Hmm! That would be really interesting if it were true. I want to believe it's true. I have strong reason to believe (in the thread I posted a few weeks back) that Townsend's demo at General Electric's King of Prussia facility did kick off an interest in MHD generators, specifically by John Marlin Smith who was at GE and then went to NASA, but I don't know if that MHD stuff ever "worked" to the point of being a functioning deployed military product. There sure was a lot of time and money spent on it though!

3) Newton's flux calculus, with its notions of infinitesimal rotations and integral approximations, where based on the foundation provided by Coulomb's (wrong) idea that all points are infinitely small and equally attractable, which makes the whole thing wrong.

Well yeah, we know from common sense that infinitely small points can't exist and also quantum physics is built on the idea that they can't, so there's two good reasons to suspect that something's wrong with classical physics, and that the infinitesimal calculus isn't useful for very small distances and times. Sure. But exactly what Michael's specific beef with Newton is here, and how it's different from the mainstream set of quantum beefs with Newton, I'm not smart enough to understand.

I feel like there have been made changes to the internet. It is a lot harder to find Raymond's old comments now.

The Internet is always changing, you're definitely not imagining that. Sites go offline all the time and Google constantly change their search algorithm - and yes, Google Search has got much worse in the last five years. I use the Internet Achive wherever possible, but sometimes people request the Archive to remove stuff.

If you're looking for Raymond's comments on this particular web forum, you can use the search function here. The Cosmic Token might be a little harder to search, but there do exist some backups of it. (Sadly text-only, the ones I know about).

remember that Irving Langmuir won many prizes in surface chemistry for having invented arc wielding in the first place, complete with a method of producing monoatomic hydrogen from this technology.

Ha, that one's familiar! I remember falling into a "monotomic hydrogen arc welding" rabbit hole in the 1980s. In one of the many New Age-y "suppressed technologies" books/magazines I was reading at the time. Fortunately I'm not mechanical so I never was tempted to investigate for myself and possibly get blown up. But yeah. That one's part of the sprawling suppressed-technologies mythos.

And Karl Pearson described the forwards facing arrow of time as an artefact of consciousness, and claimed to not believe in thermodynamics at all. This view led to a spacetime where the speed of velocity determined the actual progress of time, and whether or not it went forwards, backwards, or standstill was basically down to the motion of the observer.

The "consciousness-created arrow of time" is a real and quite common speculation, yeah. And I remember encountering the "absolute speed of time" one too! That interpretation of Relativity made so much more sense to me than the vanilla kind that it was one of the reasons why I wasn't interested in studying physics: there seemed to be too much unnecessary nonsense in the mainstream theories. (That and computers were too much fun to play with, and didn't involve burns or electric shocks.) Thank you for reminding me of the name Karl Pearson - I want to go check him out now.

That was just a warm up to the more important “cooling” experiment in which we managed to cool the center of a light bulb filament while it remained lit on both sides of the area being quenched.

Yeah, the light bulb cooling stuff sounds really, really interesting. And I can see a direct line between this and the "Blomgren/Interprobe electrostatic cooling" of the 1970s and then the "electrohydrodynamic heat transfer enhancement" of 1999. Yeah, pity the photos have gone.

I can suddenly understand why Raymond was thinking about the reversal of entropy / reversal of time: as an explanation for weird cooling. The flow of time is usually linked to the flow of heat in mainstream physics. Doesn't mean Raymond / Michael were right, and I don't particularly like it myself, but I can see why they'd go down that rabbithole.

the plasmoids produced in apparatus by those such as Bostick, K. Shoulders, and Matsumoto, and anomalous geophysical phenomena.

Yep, the "military-adjacent weird science / New Age" faction of the mid-1970s on seem to be fascinated by plasmoids, and the idea keeps getting floated as an explanation for some types of UFOs. Certainly the "foo fighter" reports of WW2 sound like some kind of plasma balls.

My analysis on the Roskos death was passed onto the makers of that popular Netflix series, but they couldn't be bothered to write a fifth episode and script it.

I watched that show and thought it pretty well captured the dizzying feeling of studying this material - and trying to stay sane. But yes, a lot of the specific (and interesting) weird science claims were skipped over in favour of just a general "vibe".

I had a half-hearted conversation with Dr. Peter J Osborne

I'm not familiar with that name - he sounds interesting!

He said that Brown's discovery was used in submarine propulsion, underground mining, pryamider satellites for ultrawideband communications, and on a strange outgrowth of the VAX computer system developed by Riconosciuto himself.

Yeah, I'm not sure about all of those claims either.

Submarine propulsion: Obviously Townsend Brown in the 1920s was interested in electric ship propulsion, and from Tom Clancy's "Hunt for Red October" (which was weirdly involved in declassifying the gravity gradiometer) there was a whole thing about submarine MHD propulsion.... but if real-world MHD steal subs were built, the US Navy has stayed very quiet about them. So to speak.

Underground mining: yeah, that was a thread on Linda's board as well and I never managed to figure out what that was about.

PYRAMIDER satellites: Ok, that's interesting! I thought it was a well-known project but according to a 1985 Washington Post article ( https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CI ... 0025-6.pdf ) it was "never built". So if I were writing science fiction, yeah, that would be a good project to argue for being super-deep-black. Was it? I would love to know.

Edit: Via the dedicated space nerds on the NASA Spaceflight forum ( https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index ... ic=37169.0 ) , it seems that PYRAMIDER is pop-culture famous for being the satellite system "The Falcon and the Snowman" tried (maybe succeeded?) to leak to the Russians (although they also leaked RHYOLITE and ARGUS). It sounds like it was an ambitious CIA plan for a multi-satellite radio comms constellation - possibly based on the Navy's FLTSATCOM (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleet_Sat ... ons_System ) and being "just more of that, please, for us". So maybe a way was found to make just more of FLTSATCOM.

One possible way to make more of FLTSATCOM might have been the deliciously-named UFO system: UHF Follow-On ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UHF_Follow-On_satellite ) I couldn't possibly speculate why a 1990s classified military comms satellite constellation would be named "UFO". Okay, I can: military nerds love cool names and you can't get much cooler than that. I really want there to be more, but there doesn't need to be.

"a strange outgrowth of the VAX computer system developed by Riconosciuto himself": Well Michael was obviously hacking his own encryption drivers into the VAX operating system. I believe he also alleged that he coded up a cute way of making a computer transmit radio for data exfiltration just by running software (this was in the days before Internet). That turns out to be an actual NSA technique, so there could be some truth to it. Back in the 1980s, we used to do this trick with 8-bit micros that didn't have audio speakers, because their radio shielding was awful. You made the CPU run in a tight loop and put an AM radio next to it, and you could play music. I say "we" because there was software which did it, but I wasn't smart enough to code up that machine code; it was super timing-critical. A good arcade game developer could do it though. Even the guys at Atari writing games for the 2600 had to do tricks like that. So Michael R being able to do this isn't that far out of the box.

The VAX was also a pretty common and "hackable" computer for the university set of the 1970s, before microcomputers and even during a lot of the 1980s, so yeah, Michael could well have built any kind of hardware or software extensions to it. Would be much like a hacker claiming to have built extension boards for the Apple II. Sure, very possible.

Last but not least, was his claims on nanotechnology scaling up the effect through synchronized pulses, known today as Active Force Material

Talk about nanoscale engineered materials (as opposed to Eric Drexler's fictional "nanoassemblers" which became the science fiction gimmick of the 1990s) has been around in optics for quite a few decades, and radar stealth and antenna design was probably the first area when that was used. If the BB effect is a real thing, then the problem being that it needs special materials to scale up would make a lot of sense.

Today's buzzword for this sort of stuff is "metamaterials" but I'm sure even back in the 1980s the aerospace and science magazines were talking about building up custom materials down to the atomic level, at least as stuff they wanted to do if not stuff they could quite yet do.

that it worked to change the mass of the proton in any dielectric material.

Hmm. Could be. Again, if the BB effect is real, then any explanation for it might also be real. The big question though is "is it real" and "if it's real, where are the replications and can I see one?"

even more crazy theoretical buzzwords entered these rants: Phase conjugation

Yeah, Tom Bearden was all about phase conjugation in his 1980s claims about "scalar electromagnetics". Doesn't suprise me that Raymond and Michael would also be into that area of speculation, since their social circles seem to overlap Tom's.

a man calling himself William Rossier showed up, and I recognized him from a dossier compiled all the way back when from the hand of the great Rodney Stich.

Interesting. Those are some names I haven't heard before!

The Leviathan controls the quantum possibilities of existence and I was a fool to challenge it.

Perhaps. I choose to believe that existence is controlled by beings and forces much smarter and wiser than anyone involved in the military-industrial complex, or any other human elite.

For those still following this conversation, "non-unitary" is code for "faster than light". At least, in a technical sense.

Yeah, my brain just doesn't "get" quantum mechanics, like at all, so I wish everyone working on that extremely heavy maths the best of luck. I do believe that there is a lot of stuff in the universe that travels faster than light, because of the whole psi thing that doesn't seem to be bound by space or time at all.

Regards, Nate

[Henry_Yang]

Dear NateCull,

I am happy that this thread is going in a lot of interesting places, very fast! Here I attempt to add a little more and further explore all of this wonderful information!!!

Trying to untangle the jumble, I've found, is a little helpful for one's sanity, but trying to slam one's brain headfirst into it all isn't so much. I first hit the Townsend Brown mythos as a teenager in the 1980s and I had to step back for several decades and clear my head before encountering it again.
Because a lot of the stories spiralling around Townsend Brown, Tesla, MKULTRA, etc, all have roots in reality, but they're also stories told by scared and angry military and ex-military people -- and some of these stories are deliberately designed as weapons to cause confusion and hurt.

This is on point with my experience. As a teenager, I heard about it for the first time. And yet, the skeptics convinced me that it was all just "ion wind". Don't trust everything you read on Wikipedia!!! lol

It took several years for me to come back to it, after that. I believe now that Raymond was right, and that the energy transfer formulas of electrohydrodynamics are more important than ion wind.

Take into account the Reynolds numbers from electrohydrodynamics. They are known to impact electrostatic heat transfer. And they are not due to the ion cloud. They are due to the hydrodynamics properties of the cloud. There also exists Buckingham's Pi theorem, which relates all dimensionless quantities, such as these Reynolds numbers, into maps to other ones when arbitrarily switching units. As Einstein said, the true laws of physics are invariant.

Ions are too heavy to account for the efficiency and speed of the Blomgren probe. I don't think Michael was exaggerating on his account of it. The Hercules Powder company was already selling the METC unit and when he apparently redesigned it into a cookie cooler rack, or something, for higher temperature and higher voltage levels, he was poised to make millions of dollars. I don't know his exact involvement in this deal, or if the technology is really his, but Raymond said that high up military intelligence people stole all of Michael's equations and hard work on clarifying all of the new physics involved.

Mikado here seems to be describing the "scalar electromagnetics" idea first promoted back in the early 1980s by Tom Bearden, which seems to be a kind of white whale / holy grail chased by a lot of these weird military-adjacent science people. The idea seems to be that if you intersect two beams (of microwaves or lasers, say) you might get some "extra" component to the electromagnetic field. A "longitudinal" rather than "transverse" wave. I really like that idea and I want it to be true and thinking about it it has colonised a large chunk of my (recreational musing) brain, but I am not sure whether it actually is true. But I certainly want it to be.

HMMM... I think you might have actually just found those secret equations!!! I am somewhat familiar with Bearden. I know he was influenced heavily by Mendel Sachs, who rejected the Poincare group in favor of GL(4,R) for General Relativity. This doesn't work. A lot of the electromagnetic vectors disappear in a vacuum, leading to energy conversation violations.

Although I would also like to point out that regular General Relativity also has its shortcomings. The energy conservation of the global gravitational field when carrying an energy gradient, such as its own momentum, always turns to zero in some coordinates. It vanishes, and many people have argued that in this regard, Einstein MAY be as wrong as Sachs. Sachs was torn about brutally for his mistake, but he never understood why, and banged on loud enough to build a crowd of Bearden and others.

John Marlin Smith

I gotta research this person!

The Cosmic Token might be a little harder to search, but there do exist some backups of it. (Sadly text-only, the ones I know about).

I thought that was down permanently... I wonder where those archives are???

Ha, that one's familiar! I remember falling into a "monotomic hydrogen arc welding" rabbit hole in the 1980s. In one of the many New Age-y "suppressed technologies" books/magazines I was reading at the time. Fortunately I'm not mechanical so I never was tempted to investigate for myself and possibly get blown up. But yeah. That one's part of the sprawling suppressed-technologies mythos.

Well, the effect is real, but the layer of hydrogen is only one atom thick!!!

I can suddenly understand why Raymond was thinking about the reversal of entropy / reversal of time: as an explanation for weird cooling. The flow of time is usually linked to the flow of heat in mainstream physics. Doesn't mean Raymond / Michael were right, and I don't particularly like it myself, but I can see why they'd go down that rabbithole.

I get the impression that Raymond's spin off experiment was never done, and that the real treasure lies in reproducing Michael's results. There may be other people that have already done this, now in 2025, almost 40 years later after Michael allegedly did them on in the black labs of Hercules, Sonoma, and Cabazon Arms.

Michael was also a shareholder in Tymeshare, the group that developed the thesis of the Dynamic Knowledge Repository. This theory was developed, I think singlehandedly, by Douglas Engelbart, who quit the group to continue the theoretical work on his own. He wanted to make a data sharing system that could assign attention weights to all data and overcome the problems of Lambda calculus, which is that most semantic data is meaningless due to logic always being essentially void of external content. The attention weight scheme reminded me of the work of Bernd Schmeikal on the UNIVAC 1106, which was published in 1975, and one of the earliest papers to tie a lot of quantum mechanical math with the hyperbolic distributions of attention weights in pure linguistics. He found that collective action was the key to what a society valued and devalued, and individuals in the nonattentive sector remained lost in double binds, which he said where unescapable. They sound like Raymond's "strange loops", but only in an evil and dark sense.

Eric Drexler

He was always ahead of his time...

Yeah, my brain just doesn't "get" quantum mechanics, like at all, so I wish everyone working on that extremely heavy maths the best of luck. I do believe that there is a lot of stuff in the universe that travels faster than light, because of the whole psi thing that doesn't seem to be bound by space or time at all.

Localization is a large problem for the current standard model, but blog posts by John Baez linked that problem to the concept of a motive, which happen to form towers of Grothendieck spaces, which each have an internal logic that maps their elements onto themselves. The positive Grassmannian Gr(2,4) is closely related to Minkowski space M = GL(4,R), and likely one of the keys to understanding this interplay of category theory with quantum interactions. Speaking of which, I think quantum computers should not be thought of digital computers. They are like analog computers. 1s and 0s are not separate in the latter.

So do please take care of yourself.

I try, but today, at 4:30 PM, a random guy came up to me on the sidewalk outside and punched me in the heart five times, with no hesitation. He wanted to kill me. I was in the hospital all afternoon. I barely got away. I was lucky. I was throwing up blood and thought I punctured a lung.

And I have proof of my hospital visitation on a CD, which contains scans of my now severely damaged chest. However, all five police reports disappeared, and no detective ever came to find the culprit. I know it sounds unbelievable, but I just lived through this today.

Curious incidents like this has happened with extraordinary frequency ever since I left Ft. Leonard Wood, which erased all records of my service. The bastards.

I sense changes in all of society, coming for all of us. Something evil is getter more powerful. And even The Octopus is afraid of it. The few of them that are still alive, anyway. John Lear was the only good one I ever knew.

[natecull]

Hi Henry

I am somewhat familiar with Bearden. I know he was influenced heavily by Mendel Sachs, who rejected the Poincare group in favor of GL(4,R) for General Relativity. This doesn't work. A lot of the electromagnetic vectors disappear in a vacuum, leading to energy conversation violations.

I've read that Einstein was also troubled by the problem of the electromagnetic field vanishing in a vacuum in several of the unified field variants he tried.. also with the gravitational field vanishing in a vacuum in the initial versions of General Relativity. I guess it's a very hard problem to do what Einstein was trying to do.

I gotta research this person!

Here's the thread where I mentioned him: viewtopic.php?p=22989#p22989

I may be completely wrong and it might be a red herring. It's just that if we search scientific papers for the word "electrohydrodynamics" in the early 1960s (about the time that Townsend Brown began using it, and well before the term was widespread), we find this citation:

Smith, J. M. Theoretical Study of the Electrohydrodynamic Generator. General Electric Technical Report R 6l SD 192, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania: General Electric Company Space Sciences Laboratory, 1961.

John Marlin Smith seems to have been a very skilled nuclear engineer who after 1961 began researching and publishing about "magnetohydrodynamic" power generation rather than "electrohydrodynamic" well through the 1970s. It seemed to be a long and laborious process to try to get actual power (and not just voltage) out of the systems he was looking at.


GE's King of Prussia (or "Valley Forge") plant appears to have opened in 1960. ( https://www.kophistory.org/ge-comes-to-town/ and https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/es ... -industry/ ) I'm not clear on the exact date.

In 1973, Townsend Brown wrote to Rolf Schaffranke:

The experiments in vacuum were conducted at Soc. Nat. Construe, Aeronaut, in Paris in 1955-56, in the Bahnson Laboratories, Winston-Salem, North Carolina in 1957-58 and at the General Electric Space Center at King of Prussia, Penna. in 1959. Laboratory notes were made, but these notes were never published and are not available to me now.

These are the puzzle pieces. We don't see any written evidence of JM Smith becoming interested in any of Townsend's other interests (propulsion, fans, loudspeakers or communication), only power generation.

The word "electrohydrodynamics" and its variants "electrogasdynamics" and "electrofluiddynamics", like "magnetohydrodynamics", is also more generally associated in the literature around 1961 with the name Hans von Ohain than with Thomas Townsend Brown. von Ohain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_von_Ohain) was a Paperclip German and a big name at Wright-Patterson - Director of the Air Force Aeronautical Research Laboratory by that time.

It's possible that Townsend did not originate the term "electrohydrodyamics" and that he borrowed it from von Ohain as a fashionable description of the more unusual approach he was taking. It's also very possible that the device JM Smith was studying in 1961 came from von Ohain and not Townsend Brown. It is very likely that it was this device described here by Terry N Lauritsen, built at Wright-Patterson in 1960, ( https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD0292334.pdf ) which... I'm not sure if was a flame jet generator? Possibly it was just powered by compressed gas.

But we have Townsend's own words to say that he demoed something - presumably to someone in particular - at GE King of Prussia / Valley Forge in or around 1959, possibly 1960.

And the Lauritsen report from Wright-Patterson does describe circa 1960 EHD generator research at General Electric:

General Electric Company has stated that the major limitation of the corona discharge technique of ionization is the limited current (about 10 pa) which a corona point can produce (Ref 9:76). However, Petruzzella achieved a maximum current of I6O pa from a single needle (Ref 7:42). His diameter of flow at the needle point was double that used by General Electric. On the other hand, the flow diameter at a needle point of the generator tested for this thesis was only half of the diameter used by General Electric, and with Configuration VII, at P0 = 200 psig, each needle produced roughly 28 pa. At the highest pressure used (P0 = 240 psig), the current per needle was 30 pa. (Data taken from Figure 21, divided
by the number of needles, 25.) This certainly shows that geometry and gas flow properties have a great influence on the output of a corona discharge needle.

The reference to "Petruzzella", aparently also playing with such a device, is this:

Petruzzella, N» L. Corona Pischarge-Aerodynamic Ion Flow Study. Unpublished independent study. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch College, 1959.

I wonder if it might be this N Petruzzella, who died in 2022:

https://www.dispatch.com/obituaries/pwoo0302853

Nick was the first of his family to attend college at Antioch College, in Yellow Springs, Ohio, graduating in 1960. Nick married Pat Rhines and in 1959 they had a daughter, Leona. In 1960 they moved to Columbus, Ohio where Nick earned a Doctorate in Physics from The Ohio State University. He worked for the Xerox Corporation in Rochester, New York for a number of years where he was granted several patents. Nick and Pat were divorced after Leona's tragic passing due to a heart condition, in 1968. After returning to Ohio, Nick became an Associate Professor in the Physics Department at Ohio State until he left to open a printing and duplicating business on High Street, called Zip Services. Nick enjoyed running his own business, and served as president of the University Business Association for several years.

So, one wonders.

a random guy came up to me on the sidewalk outside and punched me in the heart five time... And I have proof of my hospital visitation on a CD

That experience does sound traumatic. I hope you recover soon.

Did you say that your hospital gave you scans on a CD? That seems an odd thing for them to do because computers that can either read or write CDs haven't been sold for many years.


Regards, Nate

[Jan Lundquist]

Butting in to a very enlightening exchange to day, Oh my gulay, Henry. What a horrible experience. I hope you heal quickly and have no long lasting effects.

Nate, I know, it seems primitive, but when my husband has x rays made at our local medical center, he is given CD to take to the surgeons at the larger hospital farther away. They may be using ancient computers to do it, but they haven't yet implemented a better method.

jqn

[natecull]

Nate, I know, it seems primitive, but when my husband has x rays made at our local medical center, he is given CD to take to the surgeons at the larger hospital farther away. They may be using ancient computers to do it, but they haven't yet implemented a better method.

Wow. Yeah, that's apparently a whole thing! https://www.quora.com/Why-do-MRI-and-ra ... ers-stupid

Blank CDs would be more cheaper and more secure than USB sticks, at least for the hospital, and I guess X-ray/MRI machines won't be upgraded anytime soon. And I suppose the hospital doesn't care whether any patients can actually access that data, just that they've done their legal duty by providing it. Hopefully CD-Rs (and readers!) will continue to be manufactured around the world for a few more decades just for this one specific use case. I was sad to see them go away.

Regards, Nate