Those of you who are bold enough to try and understand the math should read and understand one of the chapters (page 60)in the book “Stochastic Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Spaces” (ISBN 0-582-24490-0)

Full context and link below. This comes from Raymond Lavas, and is the second official time he mentioned being driven here by none other than Michael Riconosciuto.

RV and Link theory is ABOUT HOW SUPERSPACIAL COMMUNICATIONS can possibly function.

John Nash (a beautiful mind) was also a key source of knowledge,and suffice it to say that many of us (including myself) have suffered the “Nash syndrome” (subliminal messages from unknown sources).

Now we believe that we understand how the “connectivity” functions. (superspacial time loops in Clifford Space)

The math is sometimes reffered to as “Random Associative Symbolic Processing”.

Those of you who are bold enough to try and understand the math should read and understand one of the chapters (page 60)in the book “Stochastic Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Spaces” (ISBN 0-582-24490-0)

By the way I have collected ALL of Claude Shannon’s work on this. There is 500 lbs of documentation (raw Data) in my living room (not including the books). I am OBSESSED with this, and I have found myself thinking about VERY STRANGE visions in the middle of the night on several occasions. (Nash syndrome)

I don’t yet completely grasp all of the math in this book myself so please be patient with me OK???

My mentor (MJR) is partially responsible for introducing me into this field in 1983. He (MJR)was himself mentored by Nobel Laureate Dr. Arthur L. Shalow.

(MJR)is the infamous “Dangerman”. I’ll explain more about this in the future.

This is a long complex conspiracy story that many have refused to believe.

Well I LIVED IT MYSELF. It’s an open wound as far as I’m concerned.

- Raymond Tromprenard, February 19, 2006 at 10:22 am

"Were Tesla and Brown On To the Same Thing?"

https://www.ttbrown.com/brown-and-tesla/

Richard Shoup, inventor of The SuperPaint System, says this regarding Link Physics:

New approaches are emerging, however, in which measurement can be understood as a time-symmetrical interaction between the quantum and the classical domains, without the mysterious collapse (Etter & Noyes, 1998; Cerf & Adami, 1996 a,b)

"LINK THEORY & PSI: Anomalies and Constraints"

RICHARD SHOUP, Boundary Institute

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? ... a456dd17f5

And Tom Etter, the inventor of Link Physics, makes similar claims:

When constraints on past and future are equally balanced at all times, dynamical Markov theory reduces to quantum mechanics.

...

The wave function only applies to pure states, which are given by link states matrices which are separable into pairs of vectors.

...

The general pure link state has two different vectors.

...

In the quantum case these two vectors are equal, so we need specify only one. A kinematic state is specified by one vector.

...

Our worst mistake in trying to understand quantum mechanics has been to confuse the wave state at t with a kinematic state at t.

...

Dynamical Markov States and the Quantum Core

Tom Etter, Boundary Institute

https://web.archive.org/web/20061030044 ... Markov.pdf

Anyway, the paper that Raymond Lavas originally mentioned is here:

EDIT: Could not get any images to imbed so I found this online link, which is an earlier draft of the same thing:

https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcont ... disstheses

... And also, it turns out that the invention of RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) by Markus Kuhn was preceded by a research program called the RASP (Robust Accurate Statistical Parsing), of which Kuhn contributed the invention of the computer language BCPL (Basic Combined Programming Language).

One has to wonder then if RASP (Robust Accurate Statistical Parsing) and RASP (Random Associative Symbolic Processing) are related.

Pierre Noyes and Tom Phipps where associated with Tom Etter in the early 90's and many of Phipp's papers detail the physics of "longitudinal Ampere forces", such as this one:

"Observations of the Marinov Motor"

Thomas E. Phipps, Jr.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? ... 08faf122f0

...Wherein it is claimed that Special Relativity is incompatible with the observation of these waves in this particular configuration of induction motor.

Any thoughts?