Essentially it did, but......htmagic wrote: Mikado, I know this was a long post for such a simple question but did that answer your question?
......does this mean the agenda would be of a technical nature? When you ask about technical details you could say an automobile has an internal combustion engine, a transmission and a differential and that could be considered technical. Therefore, I suppose my question would now be, How technical are you talking? We always, as Victoria suggested, could get a hold of Mark Bean and perhaps he could fly a few discs for a starter.htmagic wrote:I personally would not wish to attend if it were a UFO conference only. I would like to learn more and discuss the technical details of Dr. Brown's work. I would most especially like to see any technical demonstrations of his work or plans that I could build and present (maybe at a later conference, who knows?).
Since my loud mouth is second to Elizabeth, I have become more of a lurker. I have ordered my drover's coat and I already have my black leather hat. In other words, it is more fun to read at this point.htmagic wrote:As for being slow, Mikado, at least you've had the luxury of being one of the earlier members on this forum. You've seen a lot of these posts as they were first discussed. You didn't have to "cram" like some of us late-comers. Not only do I have to keep up with all the posts flying around right now, it is interesting to go back in time in this forum's FTM and read some of the earlier posts. There is a LOT of fascinating data to absorb here. Someone said this forum is like a fast moving train and I would have to agree. I spend a lot of time on this forum and my wife has been seeing the back of my head lately as I'm on the computer! But at least she knows where I am!
And when his eyes were opened he begat a sight that was not as anticipated and he.....htmagic wrote: Some of the posts "opened my eyes" so to speak.
"Twas blind, but now I see..."
Mikado