skyfish wrote:<SNIP>
Planck's constant: Planck's constant is a fundamental parameter in quantum mechanics. It determines the size of the discrete units or energy, mass, spin, etc. into which the microscopic world is partitioned. Its value is 1.05 x 10-27 grams-cm/sec.
Mikado,
So, plancks constant, as a quantifier of time, is the unit of measurement that would have to be involved in the equation that determines the amount of energy in the aether. I was just thinking about that very posssibility a couple of hours before I found this article!!!!! How many plancks constants are there in all of time?!?!?!? That is the question!!!! lol
Right?
OK....it keeps coming....
it would be that total planck time value(all of time...whatever that is!!!) times the energy available in the zpf field at that moment (TIME ENERGY...T), and e=mc^2 would represent the energy in relative space at that moment(SPACE ENERGY....S)
E=ST
That is saying the totality of the universe is all of space and time....and that seems so simply true.
I like to keep it as simple as possible!!!
It is a really volume equation that represents an energy value....like this...
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q ... a=N&tab=wi
So that equation would give us the energy available in that light cone!!!
Excuse me while I climb down from the ceiling!
The frequency of time? Gravity pulses that match plancks constant....the FUZZINESS of time! That makes it sound so cute! lol
But also the frequency of gravity???
That does suggest the unifaction we were talking about does it not? This would be verification of the levels of energy we were talking about also.
Synchronicity!
skyfish
skyfish wrote:Magic,
I do not remember Mikado showing me anything on dimensional analysis. I was referring to the article about the fuzziness of time. That links gravity and time.
skyfish
twigsnapper wrote:Skyfish,
truer words were never spoken, no matter who said them!
"If you grab the tail, you get the whole cat!"
And the thing is, once you have grabbed the cats tail ( Mikado, you listening?) You had better danged well not let go until the matter is resolved. <g> twigsnapper
skyfish wrote:Magic,
I do not remember Mikado showing me anything on dimensional analysis. I was referring to the article about the fuzziness of time. That links gravity and time.
skyfish
Mikado wrote:These factors don't normally go together for in essence you have Energy = Space X Time which could on first blush be similar to E = m c<2, in that Mass can be either viewed as density or a volume in a given area and that velocity has time has a unit within it and this can be considered a Force equation and is very similar to Newton's F = 1/2 m v<2 and Lorentz is needed in between. I suppose I am asking here how you derived and extrapolated your original equation. and what are the unit of measurement for each, "e", "s" and "t"?
skyfish wrote:Mikado, Magic,
OK...does that help explain the relatinship between gravity and time? With the evidence in the article about fuzzy time, it shows a clear connection berween time and grvity.
Time and gravity, linked in the aether, would represent a real energy value.
The article shows that time is not just a measure of time but a measure of gravity too and a unit of energy.
Are you saying that dimensional analysis can provide values for these?
Wouldn't that be linking these value in a way never done?
Time and graity having a mathematical relationship?
If dimensional analysis is that method, could you please show me how?
skyfish
skyfish wrote:http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081110/full/news.2008.1217.html
time=gravity
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081110/full/news.2008.1217.html wrote: Hocus pocus
Of course, theorists are full of extraordinary ideas that never pan out, so physicists at GEO600 are treating Hogan's ideas with a healthy dose of scepticism. "To me as an experimentalist, this all seems a bit like black magic," says Karsten Danzmann, principal investigator for GEO600, and director of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. "It seems a bit far-fetched and artificial. But if it's true, it's Nobel-prize-winning stuff."
Hogan says that the noise could be responsible for about 70% of some unaccounted for noise that GEO600 is recording. Danzmann says it's "intriguing" that this noise just happens to be the right magnitude and shape to account for most of the 'mystery' noise that his team has been unable identify for a year now.
Return to The Science of Townsend Brown
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests