The Final Word on Bill Moore...?

[kevin.b]

Trickfox,
In the list below force fields , is chirality.
The chirality of mass has been pulling me for quite some time.
Most people see a train zooming along in one direction, I imagine another going almost as fast in the opposite direction.
If you were to divert one of these trains off onto another branch line, the one remaining would not have the resistance of the opposite direction train, thus it would travel rather faster.
In fact it would travel that fast you wouldnt be able to see it.
Chirality will be how to divert one of the trains direction.
If the speed of light is a consequence of the two trains passing each other, imagine what the speed will be without the other?
If gravity( relative to the Earths surface ) is the consequence of one train going fractionally faster than the other, imagine gravity in just one direction.
In fact imagine it in all directions at once, and by simply diverting whatever train off to each side , you will simply go with the flow.fast.
Kevin

[Mikado14]

Trickfox,

In addition, I find those in red to be interesting as well.

Green - One has to wonder where the data or the results came from in order to write this chapter.

Orange - Submarine?

Cyan - Now this has my undidvided attention for certain reasons....How about you Tromprenard?

I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 2
1.1 Background and Theoretical Developments ....... 4
1.2 Measurement ................................... 6
1.3 Force Fields .................................. 8
1.4 Chirality - Odd Number Space-Like Dimensions .. 11

II. THEORIES .......................................... 13

2.1 Introduction .................................. 13

2.2 General Framework of Theory ................... 14
2.2.1 Born - Infield ............................ 17
2.2.2 Lande' .................................... 19
2.2.3 Podolsky .................................. 20
2.2.4 Corben .................................... 21
2.2.5 Flint ..................................... 21
2.2.6 Ingraham .................................. 21
2.2.7 Arctan Potential .......................... 23
2.2.8 Milne ..................................... 24
2.2.9 Williams .................................. 25

2.3 Development of 5-D EM Equations ............... 27
2.3.1 Modifications to Maxwell's Equations ...... 33
2.3.2 Lorentz Forces in 5-D ..................... 36
2.3.3 Wave Propagation in 5-Space ............... 38
2.3.4 Limits to Conversion Rates ................ 40
2.3.5 Reduction to Newton's Laws - PPN .......... 41
2.3.6 Thermoelectric Potentials in Gravity Field. 43
2.3.7 Field Vectors and Equations in 5-D ........ 44

2.4 Conservation Laws ............................. 47
2.4.1 Conservation of Energy .................... 48
2.4.2 Conservation of Linear Momentum ........... 50
2.4.3 Conservation of Angular Momentum .......... 51
2.4.4 Conservation of Parity .................... 53
2.4.5 Conservation of Pseudovectors ............. 54
2.4.6 Conditions for Non-Conservations .......... 58

2.5 Vacuum Fluctuations ........................... 60
2.6 Quantum Considerations ........................ 62
2.7 Compatibility of 10-D String Theories ......... 68
2.8 Mach's Principle .............................. 69
2.9 Rosen's Bi-Metric Theory ...................... 72
2.10 Non-Conservation .............................. 74
2.11 Particles in 5-D Spaces ....................... 76

III. EXPERIMENTS

3.1 Approach to Selection of Experiments .......... 78
3.2 Radiation Pressure ............................ 80
3.3 Biefeld-Brown Effects ......................... 83
3.4 Conductive Submarine .......................... 88
3.5 Gravitational Rotor ........................... 89
3.6 Spin Aligned Nuclei --
Magnetic and Rotational Alignment ............ 90
3.7 Non-Inductive Coils ........................... 94
3.8 EM Transparency of Conductive Media ........... 100
3.9 Magnetic Loop ................................. 101
3.10 Speed of Light in a Mass Flow ................. 103
3.11 Charged Torque Pendulum ....................... 105
3.12 Thermoelectric/Gravitational Effects .......... 107
3.13 Binary Pulsar ................................. 107
3.14 Proton Scattering ............................. 107
3.15 Inertial Mass Variation ....................... 107
3.16 An Improper Experiment ........................ 108

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 110

I've been outta the loop here, sleeping too much.

Mikado

[Elizabeth Helen Drake]

I saw that too Mikado. It sort of reached out and slapped at me but I wasn't going to say anything just to see if it did the same to others.

And of course I noticed also the mention of BB effects which strangely enough is mentioned right above the mention of submarines.

Elizabeth

[Trickfox]

Yes Mikado that CYAN one is interesting indeed.

I missed that the first time. I'm shooting for the theory listed at the beginning. There is bound to be some original work by these fellas and I'll find it using their names and a technical subject name of some kind.

If there is anything to be found it will be in the obscure technical white papers written by the authors.

Trickfox

[Elizabeth Helen Drake]

There is a question which those in the desert sometimes ask themselves. "Can you count the raindrops that hit the sand? How many of them land in exactly the same place?" Its an ancient question I think that is not meant to have any answer. Somehow it still seems an important consideration.

I guess the most important thing is the question? Or that we should stop to consider it?

Forgive me. I ranted at myself this last weekend for being too philosophical here on this forum. I scolded myself that thinking and considering were all well and good but a certain amount of building has to happen too. And you have to have solid things to use as building material. But its my nature I guess to drift away . Slipping my moorings is easier for me to do than most around me would realize!

You guys are doing great investigating all of this technical information! Oh so much better that you do it than me! Elizabeth

[Mikado14]

Mr. Trickfox,

Look at the one in red before the Cyan.

III. EXPERIMENTS

3.1 Approach to Selection of Experiments .......... 78
3.2 Radiation Pressure ............................ 80
3.3 Biefeld-Brown Effects ......................... 83
3.4 Conductive Submarine .......................... 88
3.5 Gravitational Rotor ........................... 89
3.6 Spin Aligned Nuclei --
Magnetic and Rotational Alignment ............ 90
3.7 Non-Inductive Coils ........................... 94
3.8 EM Transparency of Conductive Media ........... 100
3.9 Magnetic Loop ................................. 101
3.10 Speed of Light in a Mass Flow ................. 103
3.11 Charged Torque Pendulum ....................... 105
3.12 Thermoelectric/Gravitational Effects .......... 107
3.13 Binary Pulsar ................................. 107
3.14 Proton Scattering ............................. 107
3.15 Inertial Mass Variation ....................... 107
3.16 An Improper Experiment ........................

For some reason I missed that before....guess I was counting the raindrops here in a puddle <g>

Mikado

[grinder]

I have no idea what you guys are talking about here so I have one maybe insignificant question. What the heck would a " gravitational rotor" be?

Its found there in between. grinder

[Radomir]

Grinder: If I'm correct, that's one of the embodiments that TTB outlined that could use the principles he discovered to drive rotary motion via the gravitational effect. I believe Paul actually references that patent in one of his chapters--forgive me I don't have time right now to double check and post the reference. On the way out the door...

Best,
R.

[Mikado14]

I have no idea what you guys are talking about here so I have one maybe insignificant question. What the heck would a " gravitational rotor" be?

Its found there in between. grinder

Grinder,

Essentially, as I would interpret it, our friend Radomir is correct.

Mikado

[Radomir]

Thanks Mikado for the vote of confidence.

For that I went ahead and found the reference:

https://www.ttbrown.com/defying_gravity ... nergy.html

See halfway down there is a drawing of the rotary embodiment from the 1928 patent.

Night all,
R.

[kevin.b]

Radomir,
Thanks for digging that chapter out.
The most important bit is the black box.
Does anyone know the specs for the layers of alternating materials used as insulators and eletrodes?
Gravitycontrol is staring at you with that box.imo.
Remember the 25 layers of bismuth and magnesium recovered from a downed craft.
The chirality of the insulator will be critical.
I promise you, space is moving both ways at once in all directions.
Tease apart the two way, and go one way, rather fast.
electrical and magnets.
Kevin

[Rose]

Gray Barker and Townsend Brown and this came up. Its an enormous alot of material but it just came up so easily and I don't really know why so I am marking this up as one of those cosmic jokes and following its lead!


http://www.eskimo.com/~bilb/freenrgl/gravres2.html

Here are some cherries from this particular pie.

Danger Will Robinson! Some of the following information is serious,
and some is nonsense. Some of the things that might at first seem
to be nonsense, are not. And some things referenced below, which
come from serious credentialed scientists, are in fact nonsense.
Whatever the case, it's been included. Good luck sorting it out.
Understanding gravity is a matter of time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Could it be that electric charge is a fundamental thing, and inertial
mass is merely a shadow of something primal, and what we know as a
gravitational field is merely the net result of other primary fields?
Geometrize it if you find it useful to do so, but please recognize that
defining gravity as geometry lends no information to the understanding
of its cause.

Of all the forces we know, there is none stronger than a paradigm.
-- Robert Stirniman----------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

WELL EVERYBODY, LIKE I SAID ITS A BIG SITE and it goes on forever but these are pretty solid links to NASA and other qualified researchers. And I found it by looking for GRAY but never did find HIM. So whats up with that? grinder
_____________________________________________________________

I found the same pages in a different location while testing Cuil.com, a new search engine.
http://antigravitypower.tripod.com/stir ... iman5.html

What a massive bibliography!

I noticed he even icluded Deyo's offer ("I have the FIVE (5) lab books of TT Brown's R&D at the Bahnson Co. in Salem, N. Carolina 1958-9..."), but what struck me most strongly was the presence of heavy-duty physics papers devoted to the subjects of time, spacetime and Gott time machines.A couple of them even claim to show how Maxwell's equations can bee quantumly resolved with Einstein's relativity theory. I wish I understood a tenth of it.

rose.

[Trickfox]

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=MME3 ... #PPA139,M1

Wow, what an excellent book. Thank you Rose. That post led me to Gott himself. Don't fel bad, I understand around 1/100th so far but the issues are starting to make sense, however it all sems to lead towards some form of mysticism. That is where the rubber meets the road. Instantaneous communications (FTL) and spooky action at a distance.

Trickfox

[Griffin]

Yes, TTB was certainly involved with spooks and spooky action at a distance, IMO.

Griffin

[Rose]

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=MME3 ... #PPA139,M1

Wow, what an excellent book. Thank you Rose. That post led me to Gott himself. Don't fel bad, I understand around 1/100th so far but the issues are starting to make sense, however it all sems to lead towards some form of mysticism. That is where the rubber meets the road. Instantaneous communications (FTL) and spooky action at a distance.

Trickfox

You just keep pioneering that road and throwing down those breadcrumbs for those of us who are mathematically challenged. We'll follow as best as we can!
rose