MAGNETISM - AS IT RELATES TO THE ADAMS AETHER ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES
Dr. Robert Adams
Copyright © 2002 NZ
Below are four of the Laws of Magnetism:
Law One : Opposite poles attract
Law Two : Like poles repel
Law Three : A depolarized magnet neither attracts nor repels
Law Four : The Third Law cancels out the first and second
The Third Law in effect is what manifests the gating of energy from the aether at the instant in time that the magnet and stator are neutral in relation to the air gap and time. This results in the machine, at this point of time entering into a state of UNITY, i.e.
Negative time, zero point, infinity - you name it.
This phenomenon takes place at the exact center of the air gap between the magnet and the stator at time X0- and this is the vital unlocking mechanism of tapping the awesome infinite aether power of space! Thus now, in view of the aforementioned findings, it has to be acceded that there are simply "no lines of force" present at X0- . This is a very important scientific discovery and is of historical significance.
The central point described between the stator and the magnet at "zero neutral time" is the point at which all three forces of energy, i.e. torque, heat and electricity manifest and are simultaneously "gated" from the aether by the neutralization of both the magnet and the stator at "zero neutral time". Although it would appear to defy belief the magnet does not do any work per se; it attains momentary neutrality and remains cool in spite of the machine generating awesome heat, which together with torque and electric power all simultaneously continue to rise additively and accumulatively, as is graphically depicted in the CALORIMETER TEST Temperature Graph accompanying this paper.
The Secret of the Adams Motor
By Dr. Harold Aspden.
Now we come to the secret of the Adams motor.
A rotor magnet acts across an air gap between it and a soft iron stator pole. It is attracted by the action in the magnet sustaining that Bohr magneton polarization, that which gives it its magnetic properties. As the poles of the magnet and the stator come together to deliver mechanical work to the motor shaft the magnetic flux in the magnet gets stronger and stronger as the reluctance of the air gap reduces with its closure. This involves deflection of the microscopic magnetic regions in the crystals of the magnet which means that they, as microscopic solenoidal current sources, turn into one another to contribute mutual inductance energy feeding the input power to the gap by drawing on the Universal Energy Bank.
In short, we make a withdrawal of energy as the poles close to their in-register position. Now, the 'bank' wants the money back as we now allow the magnet to turn away from the soft iron stator pole, but we preempt this by 'closing the account'. We neutralize the magnetic polarization of the stator pole by a rather clever strategem. It is a design trick. The account was designed with a bias that assisted withdrawal of funds. In technical terms, the stator pole was left open-ended, meaning that at its extremity, removed from the pole gap, it developed poles endowing it with a self-demagnetizing field - see Fig. 7(a). So, when we decide to neutralize the magnetism in the stator pole, all we have to do is to apply a small current in a stator winding - see Fig. 7(b) - to produce a field acting against the magnet as soon as the gap is closed. This plus the magnet's own demagnetizing field will then drive the magnet poles back into the rotor.
It is a case of 'heads, we win some energy' and 'tails, the aether loses some energy', because that magnet, if made shorter by neutralizing the soft iron end pieces, has such a powerful coupling with the Planck action quanta in space that it can draw extra energy from the vacuum medium when we chop off its ends.
Figure 7. Adams Motor Gap Flux Control
Those who design conventional electric motors are so intent on avoiding open-ended magnetic circuits to reduce magnetizing current and keep their copper losses in check that they have missed seeing how, by planning to accept a little extra copper loss, the magnetism can work for them by supplying far more energy 'for free'!
The 'New Energy Age' that lies ahead should allow us to warm to the idea of rewriting the history of Creation as the product of a concerted motion of background electrical charge in space. It is that which accounts for gravitation and ferromagnetism. Just as the concerted synchronous collective motion of charge in orbital motion in a magnet causes the elements of the magnet to be mutually attracted, so that same action in the vacuum jitter, in being dynamically mass-balanced in matter, generates a force of gravitational attraction between elements of matter.
This is the subject of my book MODERN AETHER SCIENCE (Aspden, 1972) but it has taken the advent of the Adams motor to show us the way forward in exploiting the technology of the aether.
Footnote
It is important to stress that there are essentially three ways in which the aether will yield 'free energy'. One involves using a radial electric field to lock a spin coupling onto that the synchronous orbital jitter of the vacuum medium. Another involves the direct atomic electron one-to-one quantum coupling with the orbital jitter, developed by over-exciting a ferromagnet. These have been discussed above, the latter only in connection with the Adams motor, but there are solid state implementations, linked for, example, with the names Hans Coler or Floyd Sweet. The third route to 'free energy' involves the electrodynamic interaction between aether and an electrical plasma discharge comprising heavy ions, the so-called 'cold cathode discharge'. An electrodynamic process will not communicate a spin action, meaning no turning couple, but it can impart linear momentum in conserving energy between the aether and a material system, meaning that the aether can be caused to do work by applying an EMF to that discharge.
I intend to write in detail about all of these various techniques in a series of Energy Science Reports, several of which I plan to issue in 1994.
References
Aspden, H., 1972. Modern Aether Science, Sabberton, P.O. Box 35, Southampton, England.
Aspden, H., 1976. "Inertia of a Non-Radiating Particle", International Journal of Theoretical Physics (vol. 15, pages 631-633)
Aspden, H., 1994. "Power from Magnetism", Energy Science Report (No. 1), Sabberton, P.O. Box 35, Southampton, England.
Baurov, Klimenko & Novikov, 1992. "Experimental Observation of Space Magnetic Anistropy", Physics Letters A (vol. 162, pages 32-34)
Brancazio, P. J., 1975. The Nature of Physics (Macmillan Publishing, New York)
Taylor, A. M., 1966, Imagination and the Growth of Science (John Murray, London, England)
