Yes, Martin-
It’s always interesting to consider the Core Caroline in the Caroline Corps. I believe you made some particularly pertinent points, from my point of view.
“I think perhaps the more beligerent the more anti-Caroline. Does that make sense?”
Yes, it does make sense to me. Let me add “and aggressively dogmatic and totalitarian.” I believe that the Caroline Group evidences a cherishing of the freedom to grow and evolve to higher unitive levels. I base this primarily on my acquaintance with TTB.
…who would be the people most likely to notice their presence and react to whatever communications might be made available. People who take their dreams seriously maybe? Scientists who don't ask why but keep notepads by their bed and count sometimes on what they might be inspired to write. People with minds which are " out of the box and inventive" People who are sensitive and spiritual perhaps. Note that I did not say "religious" because how many of the devout followers of several religions could look upon another " Earthly intelligence, not human" and consider it ... NOT the devil? In the Bible belt Paul you'd be a long time looking I think, whereas the Eastern philosophies would be alot more open to the idea. Just as Radomir said recently in one of his messages.
The strangest thing about this interaction, if there is indeed this kind of interaction going on .... we seem to have the choice of picking up the " communications" and acting on them or turning our back on them entirely. There seems to be no conversion program. Though it staggers my imagination to see the possibilities of mass mental control...IF ... it was needed.
What you say is borne out in my own research. I believe that TTB is a likely type for taking “notice of their presence” and reacting “to whatever communications might be made available” -- as you say. He was certainly “sensitive and spiritual” as I experienced him, and his biography and this Flow Forum have confirmed. I believe we can add “humble” to the qualifications -- and TTB was that as well. “Compassionate” and “altruistic” would be qualifiers too, which I also believe describes TTB.
Interestingly, these descriptions also apply to George Adamski, from all that I can determine. Although I never met him, I have learned a good deal about him. Rather ironically, these qualities -- especially his humble origins and lifestyle -- served as some of the ammunition used to attack and dismiss his claims. I’ve seen him dismissively referred to as an “ice cream salesman” and other supposedly demeaning terms like short-order cook and waiter. Adamski did all this before and after becoming famous. He was used to hard work during his lifetime, and had served several years in a tough Army cavalry assignment on the Mexican border. He did not consider any task beneath him and performed them with dedication, good humor, and friendliness -- according to the accounts with which I’m familiar. His work on the grounds of Palomar Gardens -- which was essentially a spiritually oriented commune -- and in the café there exemplify his work ethic and doing whatever needed done. He was also quite psychically sensitive, according to various accounts. As to Eastern philosophies being more expressive of this world(s)view, Adamski chose Tibetan philosophy/spirituality as being the most descriptive of his early meditatively channeled messages. Emphasis was placed on it being an undogmatic expression of universal natural law. Later, it naturally and seamlessly blended into a cosmic context -- which it had always been oriented towards. Rigidly dogmatic and intolerant “religions” have been and still are a strong factor in the anti-ET and anti-disclosure issue, imo and experience.
Adamski also had the courage to speak out and continue to do so, in the face of increasingly ridicule, disinformation, and opposition. This was true not only about Visitants but also about their anti-nuclear message, which was particularly dangerous during the height of the Cold War. Sounds like a natural to make the cut for contact, imho, although the “powers that be” and various others might not concede it. TTB thought so, and I feel that the Caroline Group would share this belief although I certainly can’t speak for them in any way.
I have noted no “conversion” program in the usual sense, although there has been a gradual conditioning process. I do believe this is part of a plan and agenda. But it has been and is up to us, although there have been interventions occasionally when our lemming tendency takes us right to the edge of a cliff. Mr. Twigsnapper commented on this some time ago. A friend of mine who was an anthropologist saw the Visitants as behaving like proper anthropologists studying a primitive culture, and perhaps -- on rare occasions -- directly helping in some discrete ways that did not unduly disrupt or even overwhelm the culture. The lack of coercion or overt conversion methods doesn’t imply a lack of capacity though, imo.
Yes, Rose, your link definitely highlights central issues.
As ever,
Griffin