Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:16 am
Yes, I will my best.
A Place to Discuss the Life and Science of T. Townsend Brown
https://www.ttbrown.com/forum/
There are two ways of utilizing Coulomb's Law : scalar and vectorLangley wrote:Do neutrinos have mass?
They cannot be shielded against in all practicality
Are Neutrinos subject to Coulomb's Law as an electron is? Probably not at all.
The neutrinos are not subject. The electrons are. The effect is seen within the confines of Coulomb's but did not commence there. A neutrino in designed setting becomes an electron and hence is found within Coulomb confinement.
natecull wrote: 4) Like 3, but as well as cracking gravity control, Brown was also a member of an elaborate, privately-funded conspiracy group (the Carolines) which was active at the highest levels of the US/UKA military research/intelligence complex, acting for all intents and purposes as a James Bond villain-type organisation (but with noble intentions), far more organised and effective than the Soviets and their moles, never once being detected until members of that group decided to contact Paul and 'spill the beans'. This group had the resources and political pull both to fully fund and develop antigravity technology using the full resources of the American science establishment, and then to completely bury it, cutting the Navy and Air Force completely out of the loop, in order to spare mankind the horrors of something worse than nuclear proliferation. But the Carolines are now leaking this information, slowly, to private researchers... for reasons still largely unknown.
Is it just me, or do others find the whole package of (4) rather a big bite to swallow all at once? I'm not at all sure, with all the evidence we've seen so far, that we've even established more than (1).
natecull wrote:I really want there to be antigravity, and I'm an avid reader of all the fringe gravity control literature, but I also want to believe things not just because they seem cool, but because the truth points that way. I'd like to look at the big picture with 'scenario thinking', taking all the options separately, and ask why I *need* to believe that T.T. Brown actually *succeeded* in controlling gravity.
Because it is my belief that the real reasons for the Iraqi "war" is the drug trade and not the oil. With a little research you will find that "Wall Street" has been braced up by the drug trade. If any of the technology that you mentioned were used it would bring it to the public eye and they, if they have it, don't want it out. Oil is being pumped out of the ground by US oil companies for less than $20 a barrell but they are selling it at a cost of $100+ a barrell. If that is not rape, what is?natecull wrote:There's a little nagging voice inside me that keeps saying 'so if FTMs and magic teleporting submarines are REAL, why isn't a fleet of them pounding the Iraqi insurgency into ash right now?'
Translation:In zahlreichen Berichten ist in dem Zusammenhang von einer Antigravitation die Rede. Sie hingegen führen die Gravitation auf eine Wirkung geschlossener Feldlinien zurück, die sich so ohne weiteres nicht aufheben lässt.
A neutrino in designed setting becomes an electron. And the setting would be something like we find in the Biefeld-Brown effect.The neutrinos are not subject. The electrons are. The effect is seen within the confines of Coulomb's but did not commence there. A neutrino in designed setting becomes an electron and hence is found within Coulomb confinement.
The element of rotation (----->unipolar inductors?). Background of stars - does this also include various form of radiation (sidereal radiation)?"Sidereal Time" is defined as "Time based on the rotation of the earth with reference to the background of stars."
CONSIDER ALSO DR. BROWN's CANADIAN PATENT AND RESEARCH INTO GRAVITATIONAL ISOTOPES.The acceleration and storage of radioactive ions for a neutrino factory
B Autin et al 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 1785-1795
B Autin1, M Benedikt1, M Grieser2, S Hancock1, H Haseroth1, A Jansson1, U Köster1, M Lindroos3, S Russenschuck3 and F Wenander3 (the beta-beam accelerator working group)
1 Fermilab, Batavia, IL 60510 USA
2 Max Planck Institut für Kernphysik, 69029 Heidelberg, Germany
3 CERN, CH-1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
Abstract. The term beta-beam has been coined for the production of a pure beam of electron neutrinos or their antiparticles through the decay of radioactive ions circulating in a storage ring. This concept requires radioactive ions to be accelerated to a Lorentz gamma of 150 for 6He and 60 for 18Ne. The neutrino source itself consists of a storage ring for this energy range, with long straight sections in line with the experiment(s). Such a decay ring does not exist at CERN today, nor does a high-intensity proton source for the production of the radioactive ions. Nevertheless, the existing CERN accelerator infrastructure could be used as this would still represent an important saving for a beta-beam facility. This paper outlines the first study, while some of the more speculative ideas will need further investigations.
And Mr. Twigsnapper mentioned limestone previously - as a response to your thoughts Mr. Mikado. LET ME CONFRONT BOTH POSTS.Grass ... and limestone ... and underground springs.... that combination helps create ( along with their natural abilities) some of the finest racehorses in the world.
Fred..... you talked about recognizing the winning horse in a race. I wonder if there are places in upstate New York for example which are " aligned" properly for certain foals to realize their fullest potential? If it might be that children respond the same way to this influx of ... whatever it is that we are talking about here....( I will use Morgans "stuff") ... then as a horseman interested in such things I would be interested in finding the most optimum pasture to raise my foals?
Anyone wonder why Dr. Brown collected rocks from all over the world? Anyone think that was merely random? Anyone want to bet that he didn't have the exact location already plotted? " Where the four points meet" he said.
And Mr. Twigsnapper's answer:Minerals..... permitivity(permeability) - the ability of a material to carry lines of force.
Isogonic Lines of Force
Mikado
Let us tie in what Mr. (Kevin) B. said to me yesterday and the truly great article on Stonhenge, crystals, space-time, etc. that he showed us.Flow .....Ah, Ladies always let you chase them until they catch you.
Mikado ..... Limestone, anomolous grains of sand, things unseen but there.
Kevin ......A long journey Navigator.
Pleased to have your company.
twigsnapper
Mr. Mikado - what did you say about minerals and permitivity or permeability and minerals? What did Dr. Brown's say about gravity as a migration from low K and mu areas to high K and mu areas? And then consider high density/mass as a manifestation of the gravitational aspect?ROCKS ARE NOT ALL ALIKE:
In the course of these studies with rocks from various locations (Hawaii and mainland USA) it appears that the self-potential signatures of various rocks are quite different, one from the other. It is difficult to explain these individual differences unless one postulates a resonance characteristic inherent in the crystal structure of the rock. Such resonance may make the rock susceptible to on f; a specific, relatively narrow spectral bond of the incoming gravitic radiation. It is assumed, in this connection, that the natural gravitational radiation from space is a "white" or "noise" radiation of exceedingly broad frequency range. Individual rocks may resonate only on a relatively narrow band width, such as quasi-red, quasi-green or quasi-violet, with relative amplitudes which are continually changing. This could account for the wide variety of secular and diurnal patterns in self-potential exhibited by various rock specimens.
AND HERE COMES THE BIG BERTA – JAWOHL!!!! CONNECTION TO ESP, ANYONE, HM?Marcel Vogel the Nobel prize winning scientist, was one of the early pioneers of the crystal silicon chip which works in computers.
The piezoelectric nature of crystals means pressure yields electricity and electric currents emit regular mechanical pulses. Marcel Vogel has done many experiments to document his quantum theories. (Research Marcel Vogel for more information). He states that the wearing of crystals actually work.
...
He was able to duplicate the Backster effect of using plants as transducers for bio-energetic fields that the human mind releases, demonstrating that plants respond to thought. He used split leaf philodendrons connected to a Wheatstone Bridge that would compare a known resistance to an unknown resistance. He learned that when he released his breath slowly there was virtually no response from the plant. When he pulsed his breath through the nostrils, as he held a thought in mind, the plant would respond dramatically. It was also found that these fields, linked to the action of breath and thought, do not have a significant time domain to them. The responsiveness of the plants to thought was also the same whether eight inches away, eight feet, or eight thousand miles! Based on the results of the experiments the inverse square law does not apply to thought. This was the beginning of Marcel’s transformation from being a purely rational scientist to becoming a spiritual or mystical scientist.
Mr. Twigsnapper or anyone who has already figured it out - can you give us a nudge regarding the upstate New York area and THE FOUR POINTS?IBM RESEARCHER MARCEL VOGEL WAS A PIONEER IN MANY AREAS, INCLUDING SUBTLE ENERGY RESEARCH. VOGEL WAS ABLE TO CAUSE ELECTRICITY TO BE PRODUCED FROM A COIL WRAPPED AROUND A SPECIALLY MANUFACTURED QUARTZ CRYSTAL, USING PULSED BREATH COMBINED WITH INTENTION. SUCH PHENOMENA WERE REPEATEDLY WITNESSED AND INSTRUMENTED
Eestor company and barium titanate - the process of sintering. Remember barium titanate being used in the Cutlass-experiment. Remember barium titanate supercapacitors and Dr. Brown's interest in barium titanate ---> ceramic supercapacitors?In chemistry, mineralogy, and materials science, a crystal is a solid in which the constituent atoms, molecules, or ions are packed in a regularly ordered, repeating pattern extending in all three spatial dimensions.
THEY ARE ELEMINATING THE VOIDS! THEY TURN THE WHOLE MATERIAL INTO ONE BIG COMPACT CRYSTAL!!!! IN DR. BROWN'S EYES BARIUM TITANATE ALWAYS (!) HELD HIGH PROMISE DUE TO HIGH K AND HIGH DENSITY/MASS!!!EEStor's technology, described in its patent, involves sintering very small grains of coated barium titanate powder into a bulk ceramic. The process is designed to eliminate the pore space left by sintering. Barium titanate crystals have an extremely high permittivity; however, voids allow current to arc through the dielectric (voltage breakdown), causing the capacitor to self-discharge. By eliminating the voids, the bulk ceramic has properties similar to that of individual barium titanate crystals.
Sintering is a method for making objects from powder, by heating the material (below its melting point - solid stage sintering) until its particles adhere to each other. Sintering is traditionally used for manufacturing ceramic objects, and has also found uses in such fields as powder metallurgy.
Just wanted to jump in here while having some coffee, and say that it may have to do with connections to the Saudis, and the fact that we didn't really want him, it was Saddam that G. W. Bush wanted all along. That was made known when General "Stormin' Norman" retired and said "we should have plowed right into Baghdad and taken him out" but G. H. W. Bush said, "No."Elizabeth Helen Drake wrote:... why didn't we grab Bin Laden when he was between cross hairs at Tora Bora?
Elizabeth