viewtopic.php?t=110&start=15
Elizabeth Helen Drake 'A welcome': Thanks for the welcome. I've been somewhat interested in the work of Towsend Brown for several years; however, I never quite understood, or was able to accept, the explanation of the Biefield-Brown effect as given. Until now, the device I was most interested in of his was actually his high vacuum pump device, that has some other very interesting potential applications. But now with Paul's revelation that his earlier work was actually based on research into electro-magnetic (e and b fields) interactions and the use of A-Field vectors the importance of Brown's life and research takes on a whole new dimension. So, yes, I am a lot more interested in his life than I was just a few short weeks ago before I found Paul's site.
Paul S.'EHD vs MHD': "toroidal" magnetic phenomena: The use of a toroidal design to generate properly aligned e and b fields is actually not very efficient for simple propulsion since the outer fields get pretty dispersed. What the toroidal field allows is a simple design to produce a field which will enclose the entire device. Everything within that field will experience the same force vectors acting on them down to the sub-atomic level. This would, in an example of a vehicle, eliminate acceleration stress - basically everything inside the field would be in its own gravity bubble. So, is Tokamak research perhaps also about something other than fusion? I don't know, but together with the above and your ongoing revelations about what Townsend Brown's life and research was really about, it is... interesting.
"Magneto-HD and "Electro-HD" designs: I don't know either, but I think there is a need to be a little cautious when using the official nomenclature and explanations to discuss fundamental phenomena. Terms such as Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), are, as I mentioned: ".. a rather seemingly somewhat misleading term..." Electrical phenomena and magnetic phenomena are fundamentally linked together, and together with them is the force vector phenomena. Where does one leave off and the others begin?
greggvizza 'EHD vs MHD': "I don't remember seeing any of TT Browns work being magnetic in operation." And until Paul posted Chapter 27 the vast majority of us common folk who have followed Townsend Brown's work hadn't seen anything either - that is the whole point. But in case you missed the quote here it is again: "A magnetic field generated inside of and carried with the ship is arranged to fan out into the sea water." Also, as I mention above, be careful about dismissing the magnetic just because someone labels something as electric, or via versa. The three phenomena (a, e, and b fields) are linked at a fundamental level. The 'Electrokinetic Flame-Jet Generator' you mention also creates a magnetic field, regardless of whether the people who discuss electrokinetic phenomena admit it or not.
Elizabeth Helen Drake 'what would happen': "What would happen if you had a generator that would supply you with 15 MILLION volts? Meaning, what sort of field might develop?" Tesla worked with much higher voltages all the time. Would you want this field pulsed or static? A problem of course would be maintaining an independent static field of that strength. Voltage is a sort of tension or pressure and a dielectric is something that has the ability to resist against it and maintain the electrical field intact. At those levels you are talking about the charge, by necessity, being contained on very small curved surfaces. What you'd need for a dielectric to prevent leakage I'm not sure, maybe it would have to be contained within a vacuum environment. You might see some interesting interactions with whatever is in its immediate environment, the earth's natural magnetic field, and perhaps repulsion effects in regards to the negative earth. Are you thinking about 'warping' space, propulsion..?
Paul S. 'Just guessing here ....': ".. the surrounding gravitational field."
Well, it is pretty obvious that the builder of the Gravitor, and the 'Master' of Gravity thought he was onto something with his "novel arrangement of electric and magnetic fields.." It also seems just as obvious that a basic definition of gravity could be 'a force which induces motion'. And the third leg of the electro-magnetic-force trilogy just happens to be a force which 'induces motion'. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the implications, nor to see that if so, there has been a vast amount of deception and smoke and mirrors going on since long before Townsend Brown was even born. I worked one summer in the Bunker Hill mine which had levels going down past 3,000 feet. It could be that the Rabbit Hole you have found yourself in, makes the Bunker Hill mine look like my grandma's root cellar.