skyfish wrote:What is dark matter?
Shadow world?
But the idea of WIMP-less dark matter gets a little more interesting than simply considering weaker or stronger dark matter candidates. Feng says that WIMP-less dark matter could provide some support for the idea of a hidden sector – a so-called shadow world. “There are theories that there is a shadow world behind ours.
http://www.physorg.com/news148316483.html
skyfish
Hello skyfish,
A shadow world is it, but there are zillions of them and each is as real as the next so there is nothing shadowy about them or ours.
Dark matter and dark energy are hypothetical examples attempting to explain the missing portion of universe which remains hidden from view.
To understand this situation we must at least acknowledge that someone is playing hide the pea on us whereby a great portion of physics remains classified as a secret. All the things the grunts are not supposed to know.
A simple theory of everything involves a single base source of energy affecting every aspect of universe in relation to a force capable of supporting, sustaining and perpetuating all physical structure and controlling both the form and function of all physical structure.
This would position gravity and electromagnetism as dynamic responses rather than forces themselves.
What is incredible is the apparent lack of understanding concerning the nature of universe, in respect to our ability to fathom the dimensional properties of universe being different than the properties of an office or a coffee shop.
Localized conditions can be conveniently quantified in relation to the square footage of the office, the height of the doors and windows and the depth of the carpet under our feet, but to attempt to apply those same values to the structure of universe leads us into a dark and terrible place from which there is no escape.
Linearized dimensions represent a static condition of space, time and motion, yet the universe is not static nor can it be accurately described or quantified in static terms of reference, such as yards, feet, meters, grams, seconds and so on.
This is equally true of gravity, as gravity is considered to have a linear relationship with mass and acceleration etc.
Nothing could be further from the truth, as gravity does not have a linear speed, in fact gravity is not even in motion.
Gravity is simply a reflection of the field condition in which a given mass is located, whereby the mass will follow the path of least resistance to a further increase in acceleration, which is commonly referred to as free fall.
Gravity itself does nothing, it is simply a name tag for something we mistakenly perceive as a force without realizing it is nothing of the sort, but simply a dynamic response to the underlying energy focused to the core of our planet.
In this respect we might view the visible universe as the condition of universe remaining relative to our planet, whereby there is a different condition of universe remaining relative to every planetary body of universe. But those other conditions of universe are not presently accessible to us as they exist beyond the boundaries of our existing condition.
To control gravity effectively and efficiently we must learn to modulate the underlying energy affecting the condition of field (the visible universe) remaining relative to the system of reference, and in our case our system of reference is planet earth. But our system of reference could just as easily be a people made structure which was deliberately designed to modulate the underlying energy remaining relative to it.
Such a structure would have its own condition of field (visible universe) but still be capable of functioning within the field (visible universe) of the earth, which gives us a field within a field. But as there is a non-uniform differential in energy (underlying energy) existing between the field of the earth and the field of the people made structure there must also be a time/line differential as well. This means the two fields are out of sync and will affect distortions.
Unfortunately we seem oblivious to distortional effects, as this is one of the things we grunts are not supposed to know about. So mums the word, eh?
If you want to see or experience gravity control in action look up at the clouds which contain at times many tons of water. Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen and hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known substance or material and oxygen has a pretty high ratio of energy too.
And because the underlying energy of universe is dynamic it is continually increasing, whereby the energy of hydrogen has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than the surrounding air, which causes water vapor to rise skyward. But as the underlying energy of the surrounding air is focused to the core of the earth the energy diminishes with altitude making it is possible for huge quantities of water vapor to accumulate as clouds, but as the clouds grow in size their ratio of energy per unit of mass decreases. When the differential in energy existing between the clouds and surrounding air swings the other way guess what, the water vapor condenses and falls to the ground as rain, snow or hale.